The snobbery in this statement is very English isn't it. Yet another reason that people just don't like Meghan. She got "above" herself, above her station. All people like this see is the "ordinary childhood' and the "Duchess" status.
It is all part of the dehumanising of Meghan. They define her by what they say her father, and then the royal Family "gave" to her. Her own achievements are belittled to nothing, D list actress with minor role on a show no one watched running a blog that no one read, fake humanitarian etc.
The year they left, I argued with some African American women on a different forum who were saying there was a slave-master vibe to the way she was being treated by her father and the tabloids.
I now see what they mean. There is a narrative that she is a "creation" of her father, and a "creation" of the Royal Family. Everything she did between childhood and marrying Harry is dismissed because the narrative has to be maintained that she is "owned" by and "owes" her father, and she is "owned" by and "owes" the Royal Family.
I see now what the women I argued with saw then: when people speak in terms that suggest "ownership" of a woman whose ancestors were slaves, it raises its own layers!