Indeed. More aimed at the US audience, I think, as it seems to be more expected there that the rich live as much as like celebrities as possible.
See Oprah's reaction to the cottage. 🤨
A couple of points regarding management of his trust funds: he came into his mums inheritance at 30, the implication being that's when he took control of it. Iirc, the trustees were his aunts and I'm sure, terms allowing, they'd forward a one off amount for a property if he wanted to buy one. I also doubt the terms were strict enough so as to prevent this.
Secondly, he and meghan had enough money between them to rent a very expensive and large house in the very expensive cotswolds. Meghan was 'only' worth a reported ~£5 mil and even if this was in accessible cash, one wouldn't usually spend so much of it renting such an expensive property. Therefore, it can be reliably presumed Harry's monthly income was significant - and much greater than £50k.
Thirdly, the amounts he inherited from his mother and grandmother will have only increased from their values in the mid 90s and at the millennium, so he will have been worth much more a few years ago then people typically say.
Fourthly, he isn't only the son of the heir to the throne. He is also the nephew of a very wealthy Earl, who by Harry's own accounts in Spare, was deeply protective.
Fifthly, he was and remains one of the very best connected individuals on the planet. There will have been no end of individuals willing to assist him had he made his desire known (case in point: Tyler perry)
The more you unpick it, the more his claims of being comparably hard done by - financially and otherwise - fall apart.
It really disgusts me, every bit as much as the Tory government. If not more, because Harry models himself so much as "man of the people".
I also think Charles comes across pretty well in the book, tbh