Has William's alleged affair been mentioned yet or is he saving for book 2?

[Littlepiggyinablanket]

Surprised this hasn't been exposed, thought that would be the big reveal. I'm doubting there's any truth to it now unless he's saving it for book 2?

The world is a different place today though and the Taliban is a lot stronger and more sophisticated. They are in charge in Afghanistan. What may not have caused a genuine threat to life 10 years ago does now. The comment I posted from an ex Royal Marine and the way his former military colleagues and how other military officers or former officers have reacted make this very clear.

Whoever this fictional lawyer was working for they have let their client down with their indiscretions and should get the boot.

Ha ha
Must say, I can’t believe the number of royal threads started today about ‘ irrelevant’ people.

I’ve just explained the geopolitical climate has changed immeasurably over the past decade. It isn’t a case of how Harry shouldn’t have produced a number. He shouldn’t have spoken at all about his experiences nor very importantly called these people chess pieces.

I wonder as we’re discussing ‘rumours’ will Harry address the serious rumours he assaulted a prostitute in Las Vegas on his infamous trip which was hushed up in his book.

We know that he attended a partly with drug dealers and prostitutes in attendance and we can be pretty sure he was off his head on something based one the naked posing photos. Will he be addressing that event too and whose fault is was (obviously not his)

Why? Prince Harry writes a book, breaches other people's confidential information, creates speculation about who the woman was who "took" his virginity and shows how petty and jealous he is and the focus should be on William? It he's had an affair that's between him and his wife, he hasn't washed his dirty laundry in public.

@Roussette no, he shouldn’t have put a number on it, nor should he have described them as he did. I think a lot has been learned in terms of how the army interacts with the Taliban since 2013, but Harry doesn’t seem to be aware of that - perhaps because he hasn’t been on active service for a while.

Either way, he comes across as a loose cannon who hasn’t thought about the consequences of this book at all. I can understand he wants to get everything out into the open and have his say, but his scattergun approach and over-sharing of very personal (as in personal to him and M) information is baffling.

Obviously I had to look it up, wish I hadn't.

Interesting thread.

I think the ghostwriter must have outsourced the job to Jay McInenery 😀

Correct me if I am wrong, but I thought the thread title was about William’s alleged affair( affairs) and the fact that he ( allegedly) cheated on Kate when she was pregnant with Louis

@Lampzade

The criteria to be about unsubstantiated rumours not in Harry’s book. Harry has left out some serious ones of his own

it would be hypocritical to not include both

Well, the thread title refers to an alleged affair being included in Harry's book. I imagine if it was in the book we'd have heard about it by now.@

Married man has affair ... hardly groundbreaking or unusual is it! There's probably a hundred posts from women experiencing this today already.

Whatever happened, if it happened at all, they have got past it. I doubt what people are saying here though, discretion is a priority for them

I am simply going by the title of the thread .

I don’t understand how some posters can say with certainty that William has not had an affair. Very naive
I can’t even vouch for people I know let alone a complete stranger.

I don't understand how some posters can say with certainty that William had an affair. Very rude.
I can’t even vouch for people I know let alone a complete stranger.

I don’t understand how some posters can say with certainty that William has not had an affair. Very naive

For the record, I am not saying he hasn’t had an affair - how would I know?

What I am saying is that there is clearly NO confirmed sources saying he has had an affair, NO actual evidence that he’s had an affair and NO injunction preventing anyone from publishing about it. If any of those things existed it would be all over the press, here and overseas. But it’s not. What we do have is a load of gossip, that the UK newspapers are understandably reluctant to cover as the risk of being sued is very high. And that is it.

There are some factors also that point against an affair with Rose in particular (the only named other party) - Kate invited her to her first post-Covid birthday gathering at Anmer Hall, which was obviously some time after the affair started, and Kate’s new niece was also named Rose last year. (And you could say that this is just because affairs are what the upper class do, and so no-one would fall out about it - except that doesn’t square in the slightest with the whole original basis for this gossip, which was that for some reason Kate and Rose had fallen out and Kate no longer wanted anything to do with her).

So all we are left with is gossip. Lots of people desperately want it to be true of course (and it may come out into the open one day, who knows) but it’s still just gossip.

As per the thread title Has William's alleged affair been mentioned yet or is he saving for book 2? the thread titles was about if Harry had mentioned it in his book. Nothing in the title about if it was true, when it happened or if Kate was pregnant.

No one on here knows if he has or hasn't, not even the people whose great aunt's next door neighbour has a friend who does the ironing for the man who lives next door to someone else.

Yes he was lauded and praised back in 2013 by certain sections in the press. When the British army was still fighting the Taliban. When he was still in or had just come back from war.

Do I really need to spell out to you how times are very different now? 10 years later? We do not have active troops in Afghanistan, and the Taliban has only just come back in to power. It is shocking that you cannot see how the context of timing is so different.

Or that you can't get there's a difference between press photos and headlines and a direct statement (translation withstanding) from Harry.

Or that you blame you media for manipulating something when Harry said this himself, without any prompting from the media, for his own financial profit and infamy; something that all military personnel know not to say publicly.

Anything done by the tabloid press is not a justification for Prince Harry to describe the people he killed as chess pieces in a book where he also describes his penis, or for him to basically boast about how many he killed. He could have talked about his time in the war and being part of the army without either referring to chess pieces or the number of lives he took.

Do I really need to spell out to you how times are very different now? 10 years later? We do not have active troops in Afghanistan, and the Taliban has only just come back in to power. It is shocking that you cannot see how the context of timing is so different.

SF are active in all the Islamic insurgent countries. The British media ran a story in Jan 2021 about an SAS sniper in Syria killing 5 Islamic State fighters with one shot.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9181985/SAS-marksman-kills-five-Islamic-State-fighters-single-sniper-shot-3-000ft-away.html

I'm Catholic, not CofE, we believe in "the forgiveness of sins" It's in The Creed. Isn't there something in the bible about casting stones? Does the CofE teach something different?

Oh yeah, the Catholic Church was really big on forgiveness of its paedophile priests, on their victims not so much.

Priests are human, humans are fallible and everyone is entitled to forgiveness by the church if they repent. Maybe read the updates to Canon Law by Pope Francis before you judge.

Either way that has nothing to do with it being possible for Charles to be head of the CofE if he has sinned. We have all sinned, we are human.

All British troops were apparently withdrawn from Afghanistan by August 2021.
That's the official line.

I'm not sure why you gave me a link to a story in Syria, not Afghanistan, I presume because it states how many Islamic fighters the SAS sniper shot. My point before that I'll repeat as you are are a totally different person from Roussette, even though you pop up at the same time saying the same things, is this:

it is very different for a newspaper to report on the number killed by an anonymous solider shortly after the mission occurred than in the solider themselves detailing how many they killed. The latter presents more of a security risk than the former.

Especially when that former soldier is a member of his country's royal family and his father is the Commander in Chief of The Armed Forces.