Yes, it is a work of fiction, with quite a bit of truth added this season. And I think antelope is right to say it’s a ‘drama based on real events,’ in the same vein that many of the tv series and, especially, many movies we watch are ‘dramas based on real events’. The events are true, they have been dramatised.
I always thought of it as mostly a fiction, but not all of it. This season came closer to true than any previous season imo.
no one seems to question Diana’s involvement with Andrew Morton’s book -although it was told from her point of view apparently, (I’ve never read it), it’s still true for her. There are the interviews given by both Charles and Diana (true for each one), and also the recorded tape between Charles and Camilla (true for all of us) . And squidgygate (same) - an investigation that followed found it was likely Diana’s phone was tapped. So her belief she was being spied on was, it seems, true.
Although they changed the Queen’s ‘Annus horribilis’ speech - she did say it had been a bad year for her and used those words, (so definitely true for her). Unfortunately, they were words that generally went down like a lead balloon. The 90s were a tough time for many.
I’ve read on mn that William has talked about this time as being v unhappy for him (true for him)- and that was portrayed.
A lot of truth this season. And some conversations were played to the world. Of course most of the private conversations in The Crown would not be true. But still, it seems to me, that this season there’s quite a bit of truth in it.