In my unprofessional and purely personal opinion, gained through involvement in rescue with all the consequent animal welfare/stolen dogs/puppy farm knowledge that comes with it the breeder who has had these pups stolen is, at best, disreputable.
I had a brief glance at their website this morning and was troubled by the number of pups they breed, that they "specialise" in more than one breed and at the number of bitches and stud dogs owned/seemingly easily available to them.
Futhermore they are clearly not breeding according to a list of prospective owners gained BEFORE mating their bitches, as a reputable breeder would, they are advertising litters bred afterwards as well as prospective litters. They are also offering docked pups to what clearly will be, for some at least, the pet market, which is dodgy ground if not illegal. I suppose that they too, as ruby said, are getting round this by saying that they aren't able to say which pup is going to be used for working purposes... although as Pizza says, "No-one should buy a docked puppy without accompanying certification to prove that the dog has had its tail removed legally and it is intended as a working dog under the categories listed in each region's regulations."
The website for this breeder says that "Will is an A panel judge. His judging appointments have taken him all over the UK and Ireland as well as overseas to Sweden and Denmark. Will has judged the Swedish Championships.
Will judged at the 78th Spaniel Championships at Conholt Park in Andover, Hants in 2008.
Will shot at the 79th Spaniel Championship in 2009 at Belvoir Castle, Leicestershire."
Leaving the shooting aside
and the Swedish Championships (Championships by WHOSE authority?) the rest seems almost piffle-waffle as far as I can see though I'm happy to be corrected by the experts on showing - I know nothing about it. WRT "A panel judging" Wiki tells me that "The judges at field trials are appointed by the Field Trial Secretary of the organising club or society, after having been instructed to do so by the committee of the club or society.". To me that suggests that this is not a national standard and takes me back to thinking that it might be piffle-waffle.
I hope to god that these pups are found safe and sound but am troubled by the "advert" for the breeder and sympathy for HIM that the thefts might bring.
I dunno.. maybe I'm over-thinking this and I'd love to hear expert opinion but to me something doesn't make me comfortable about this breeder.