My feed
Premium

Please
or
to access all these features

Telly addicts

is it true that Angelina and my Bradd are having a baby?

61 replies

Donbean · 12/07/2005 20:16

Does any one have a link, i need evidence....

OP posts:
Report
paolosgirl · 14/07/2005 13:03

Social services seem to turn a blind eye to most things if you have the money. And yes - I still think a Hollywood marriage after 8 months, pregnant after 4, is probably destined to fail. Sorry.

Report
bundle · 14/07/2005 13:05

does anyone else think Angelina Jolie = pointless?

Report
bundle · 14/07/2005 13:06

agree, Suzy, that if she donated large wodge of her ill-gotten cash (making people sit through bad movies etc) to the fistula hospital in Addis Ababa then the quality of lives of women/children in Ethiopia would be much improved.

Report
suzywong · 14/07/2005 13:08

indeed, bundle, indeed (been down to the One o CLock club on the heath lately?)

Report
sorrel · 14/07/2005 13:10

ooh maybe i was wrong -it seems she is a serial adopter look at this

Report
sorrel · 14/07/2005 13:12

and this

Report
kama · 14/07/2005 15:07

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn

bundle · 14/07/2005 15:11

suzy, I haven't, mainly due to the parking (lack of) but have been to see the giant table & chair on the ponds side..have you heard about it?

Report
suzywong · 14/07/2005 15:12

No I haven't bundle,
Is it Camden Council wasting money again

Report
dillydally · 14/07/2005 15:13

Brad is poorly. he is too ill to make babies.

Report
NomDePlume · 14/07/2005 15:15

Brad has viral meningitis . They could've picked a nicer photo....

Report
bundle · 14/07/2005 15:15

feast your eyes on this, wong

Report
dillydally · 14/07/2005 15:18

I clicked on bundles link, thinking it would be a mega Brad pic and all I got was this lousy


If this is the way you treat honest god fearing heat readers bundle then shame on you...you hope wreaker.

Report
suzywong · 14/07/2005 15:20

blimey nora
"It's almost a reminder of the heath's hidden heroes" WTF?
I'm glad I didn't see it, I can imagine trying to peel the fragrant wong brothers off the legs as they try to shin up it

and back to brad and angelina, doesn't she have a contract that she won't get preggo while under contract to make 3 Tombraider films?

Report
Listmaker · 14/07/2005 15:25

My friend has got pg twice 4 months into a relationship. First time it obviously didn't work out but she's still with the second one and the dd is 3.5 now.

Both her pregnancies were (sort of) accidents though. I'm interested in how you would be sure enough about someone after 4 months to start TTC. I'm not judging at all ndp - good luck to you and I'm sure these things have as much chance as any to succeed. But a baby doesn't really help a relationship and I like that initial couple of years where you want to have sex all the time so wouldn't want a baby getting in the way!! Or maybe I'm just more of a cautious person. i admire your courage!

Report
bundle · 14/07/2005 15:29

dilly sorry to mislead but suzywong was hijacking re: hampstead heath..

Report
dillydally · 14/07/2005 15:33

I think if I try v hard I can get over it bundle, just give me a little time

Report
bundle · 14/07/2005 17:10

does this help to make up for it?

Report
Issymum · 14/07/2005 17:40

Suzywong asks: "would sponsorship of many children rather than ownership of two be a better thing"

The answer is, from my perspective as an adoptive mother of two children (Vietnam and Cambodia), they are two radically different things. You adopt (not own!) a child because you want to be a parent. The fact that you may have improved the future for that child and provided them with something that no amount of money can give them - a family - is a happy by-product of the adoption. If you want to be charitable, then yes, you find ways to support children in the country through supporting orphanages or children in families.

I never want the DDs to think that they were adopted because we woke up one morning and decided to do a good (if somewhat economically misdirected) deed. They were adopted because we wanted them.

Having said all that, there are a few adoptive parents whose adoptions are motivated entirely by altruism or religion. They mostly adopt special need or older children, which I respect.

And who knows what Angelina's motives are, but you can be pretty sure that her motives weren't thoroughly scrutinised by a social worker.

Report
bundle · 14/07/2005 18:30

good post issymum.

that's the problem with people like Angelina, they pop in on (presumably) private jets, it's almost like a "shopping expedition", and as you say they don't have to jump through the hoops us mere mortals have to.

Report
kama · 14/07/2005 19:20

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn

aloha · 14/07/2005 19:33

she seems a v loving parent to her son - why not to her daughter? We could all sponsor kids instead of having them but we want to be parents, why are we so suspicious of the motives of those who adopt? it's not as if bio-parents are always perfect.

Report

Don’t want to miss threads like this?

Weekly

Sign up to our weekly round up and get all the best threads sent straight to your inbox!

Log in to update your newsletter preferences.

You've subscribed!

bundle · 14/07/2005 19:36

I suppose it's because I know the lengthy and intrusive (rightfully so) that friends have gone through to adopt a child, and the (usually American) celebs seem (ok, these are my prejudices/interpretations) to breeze in/out and adopt just like that. or maybe that's just a reflection of the American system. My friend has chosen not to adopt again because she found it v tough (and would be easier 2nd time around apparently)

Report
bundle · 14/07/2005 19:36
Report
aloha · 14/07/2005 19:37

ah but that's just fun! he he!

Report
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.