At the risk of deviating from the thread, I'm a midwife. To say we are whining is really very insulting.
The issue really is that the pay scales don't accurately represent what nurses and midwives do as there is no provision for recognising seniority and expertise in a clinical setting. The only way of progressing in pay is to move away from clinical work in to management and strategic roles. If you remain clinical, no matter how expert you are your pay will stagnate and can drop as specialist clinical roles are often without the antisocial hours so you lose enhancements. My pay reduced quite dramatically when I moved to a speciality!
We need pay scales that can recognise the importance of clinical speciality, after all it is better for services users to be treated by a specialist in their area isn't it?
The whole vocation thing.... Can it not be true that nursing and midwifery are vocational careers AND that their pay needs to recognise their skill in a world where they need to pay rent or the mortgage, being up children etc rather than being lodged in nursing accommodation?
I guess this is the conflict between Phyllis and the younger ones. She had grown up where nursing was a vocation and about one of the only fairly respectable things an unmarried woman could do, she was conditioned by society to think that a roof over her head and enough food were all that she could expect without a man. The younger ones are growing up in a more open society where women are continuing to work, to be independent, consumer culture and therefore needing disposable income is increasing and they are not necessarily expecting to be kept by a man and don't think that having the bare necessities is enough any more.