Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Telly addicts

Vardy V Rooney - anyone watching?

68 replies

bellabelly · 21/12/2022 21:21

I'm enjoying it so far, although I don't know much about the case. All I know is that Colleen Rooney worked out who was leaking stories about her and then Vardy sued her for libel?

OP posts:
chary · 22/12/2022 08:10

@newnamethanks Colleen had no choice to go to court & through money around though?

highfidelity · 22/12/2022 08:12

I thought it was genius really. By using the court transcripts and adding little else, it heightens not only the ridiculousness and banality of it all, but also the stupidity of Vardy in taking this to court in the first place.

GooseberryCinnamonYogurt · 22/12/2022 08:47

V is either very arrogant or just plain stupid if she thought she'd get away with her side of this sad and sordid story.

Nolongera · 22/12/2022 09:47

We watched both parts last night, it seemed to be based mostly on court transcripts so there was no added drama.

What a fool Vardy came across as. I can only imagine she was advised time and again not to go to court.

Basic questions like do you respect others privacy where she said yes, then numerous accounts of her doing just the opposite.

The bit where the QC said the mobile phone was in Davy Jones locker and Vardy said she didn't know who Davy Jones is was pure comedy gold, even better that she really said it.

I reckon both households concerned were watching last night, and Vardy still thinks she is the victim.

minou123 · 22/12/2022 10:31

Surely RV lawyers could have prepped her better.

The whole "I used the word leak, but thats not what I meant" excuse didn't wash with them. Surely someone told her that it sounds ridiculous.

longwayoff · 22/12/2022 11:07

I reckon that the population of the world could stand in a line, each one saying 'dont do it Rebecca' and she'd still go ahead. She's just one of those people who thinks the sheer force of her will can make reality. Like Trump. You cannot reason with the totally unreasonable.

minou123 · 22/12/2022 11:28

longwayoff · 22/12/2022 11:07

I reckon that the population of the world could stand in a line, each one saying 'dont do it Rebecca' and she'd still go ahead. She's just one of those people who thinks the sheer force of her will can make reality. Like Trump. You cannot reason with the totally unreasonable.

😁

Very true.

I suppose, because she had managed to convince her husband and a couple of friends, she thought everyone else would be convinced.

minou123 · 22/12/2022 11:34

The thing that past me by during the trial was the whole Jamie Vardy issue.

He didn't testify to dispute Wayne Rooneys testimony. Yet, he was giving press statements, while everyone was still in court.

Or, was it a tactic by RV legal team? If they had put Jamie on the stand, would the door be open for CR team to ask all sorts of things that RV would prefer not be revealed?

VirginiaQ · 22/12/2022 11:51

highfidelity · 22/12/2022 08:12

I thought it was genius really. By using the court transcripts and adding little else, it heightens not only the ridiculousness and banality of it all, but also the stupidity of Vardy in taking this to court in the first place.

This. I just couldn't work out how RVs legal team allowed it to get to court! They must have known their client was terminally stupid and wouldn't know the truth if it hit her in the face. I am assuming they were banking on Caroline Watts taking the wrap for it all and when she managed to wriggle out of it they were stuck?

longwayoff · 22/12/2022 11:55

I think Mr Vardy has more sense than his wife. Telling whoppers to the media has few adverse consequences. Doing the same under oath can have many.

Yesthatismychildsigh · 22/12/2022 11:58

minou123 · 22/12/2022 11:34

The thing that past me by during the trial was the whole Jamie Vardy issue.

He didn't testify to dispute Wayne Rooneys testimony. Yet, he was giving press statements, while everyone was still in court.

Or, was it a tactic by RV legal team? If they had put Jamie on the stand, would the door be open for CR team to ask all sorts of things that RV would prefer not be revealed?

I think it’s more a case of he actually listened to someone warning him about perjury laws. But still thick enough to make it obvious he’s lying. What an utterly foul couple they are.

Bonjovispyjamas · 22/12/2022 14:40

Just watched last night's episode, I enjoyed it, but RV is looking ridiculous, god knows why she thought this was a good idea.

Yesthatismychildsigh · 22/12/2022 14:49

Bonjovispyjamas · 22/12/2022 14:40

Just watched last night's episode, I enjoyed it, but RV is looking ridiculous, god knows why she thought this was a good idea.

Thick and arrogant. Never a good combination. Look an Prince Andrew.

PrincessScarlett · 22/12/2022 16:33

I think RV was so humiliated by CR outing her on social media that she was desperate to go to court at whatever cost so she could portray herself the victim. Her mistake was thinking anyone would believe her lies.

I like that it is purely the court transcripts so it makes it a truthful account of the case rather than lots of added drama that might not necessarily be true.

It's pure trash but I do love how CR plotted to work out who was selling stories on her. I would be feeling very smug if I was CR (and rightly so).

Meltinthemiddle · 22/12/2022 21:22

I bet Peter Andre is fuming!

Believeinyou · 22/12/2022 21:40

i think colleen took it too far - just block her and move on. I didn't know the only leaked story was actually about a flooded basement

idiots the pair of them

JenniferAllisonPhillipaSue · 22/12/2022 21:45

"I didn't know the only leaked story was actually about a flooded basement"

What doesn't seem to be considered as it was the only story published. Who knows what other stories were sent to the newspaper but the paper decided not to run with them.

I think I'm too invested in this.

Echojoke · 22/12/2022 21:48

I’m sure there was also a gender selection story and maybe one about a car that Vardy sold on CR

Meltinthemiddle · 22/12/2022 21:56

I'm glad she got called out. What a nasty piece of work. Jamie needs to get rid of her!

newnamethanks · 22/12/2022 22:55

It won't only be Colleen who's been on the receiving end of Ms Vardy's malicious tittle tattle, I'd be very surprised if she hadn't made a habit of dropping titbits to the gutter press about anyone well known who'd made the mistake of befriending her. No wonder all the phone data 'vanished'. Colleen didn't take it too far, she would have settled out of court. Vardy insisted on the court action in order to 'clear her name'.

Iliveditwizbit · 22/12/2022 23:36

So disappointing , particularly Colleen’s terrible scouse accent. And the weird casting for Vardy.
I guess the clue was in the title (a courtroom drama) but I’d have loved some scenes with Colleen chatting to Wayne at home, deliberating her outfits etc .
The Wayne character was hilarious (in a bad comedy way) and silent Jamie was equally bizarre. Seemed like a low budget filler and was about as entertaining as watching a year 6 production of the story. Can’t believe Michael Sheen lowered himself to such utter shit.

highfidelity · 23/12/2022 00:55

Somewhat astonished by those who do not really understand the pared back, almost caricature approach of this.

What is most remarkable about this particular dramatisation is that it is based entirely on court transcripts. All the words (and text messages) portrayed on screen were spoken (or read out) in court. Despite the using actors, this drama is entirely based in fact, and not just any old fact, but testimonies sworn under oath in court.

Jamie Vardy's silence was not bizarre. He was mute in this because he did not speak on record in court at any point during the trial. The few scenes that took place outside of the court room where of Coleen and Rebekah, either reading through their witness statements or exchanging a flurry of text messages. There are no scenes of Coleen and Wayne at home because they would be supposition, and sometimes, fact is more interesting, or in this instance, banal and ridiculous.

The dramatisation is intended to be completely deadpan and devoid of emotion to make the trial and Rebekah's testimony all the more absurd. For once, there is just no need to make a silk purse out of this sow's ear.

As for Michael Sheen taking part, well, the trial was one of the most talked about events in the UK this year. Sheen would have been offered good money for it, and he loves to make topical dramas like this. He was clearly having a lot of fun, and rightly so.

Beaconofpope · 23/12/2022 08:14

I thought the actress playing RV did a very good job of doing that sort of very artificial aloofness that wags and other celebrities do when they have to deflect the attention which they usually lap up. It's always somehow unintentionally hilarious to me.
The walk to court in these ten inch stilettos with their little vinyl bags.
However I think RV is a very easy target for one of the UK's best lawyers. She is a bit dim and obviously guilty but the making her out to look stupid is almost malicious at times.

Turefu · 23/12/2022 09:20

Meltinthemiddle · 22/12/2022 21:22

I bet Peter Andre is fuming!

He talked about it in Loose Women a while ago. He said , it wasn’t about what was said, it was about how many times it was said and repeated over and over again. ”Someone said something stupid , I’m sure I said some stupid things in the past too, but repeating them again and again, come on”. Even if he said it to look nice, he had a point. Came out quite nicely.

highfidelity · 23/12/2022 18:47

Beaconofpope · 23/12/2022 08:14

I thought the actress playing RV did a very good job of doing that sort of very artificial aloofness that wags and other celebrities do when they have to deflect the attention which they usually lap up. It's always somehow unintentionally hilarious to me.
The walk to court in these ten inch stilettos with their little vinyl bags.
However I think RV is a very easy target for one of the UK's best lawyers. She is a bit dim and obviously guilty but the making her out to look stupid is almost malicious at times.

Agree with all of this. I strongly believe she thought Coleen wouldn't want to go to court/would retract her accusation. RV's legal team saw an easy mark, and I think if they hadn't have taken the case, RV would continued to seek legal counsel until someone took the case.

I rewatched the first part earlier and somehow missed the real life news footage first time round. Personally, I think it was incredibly well done, specifically, not to embellish it in any way was the masterstroke. As a morality tale or even just a sign of the times, it is perfect as is - RV's sense of entitlement, stupidity and guilt is laid open for all to see. I mean her text messages were incriminating and then some, she just could not explain them away, and the fact her agent did not give evidence, wow, that's just exposing her own guilt.