I think it's partly that Hayley is enjoying her five minutes of fame and being the voice of dissent. Fair enough - it would be a dull programme if everyone rolled over and said 'Yes Hugh, no Hugh, aren't you jolly marvellous, Hugh' - so she's a godsend to the producers.
Her argument is rubbish, however. This is the BIG problem with food production and consumption in this country, imo - the idea that good food means expensive food, that eating well, ethically, healthily means having to have a middle-class salary/lifestyle. It doesn't. You think free-range chicken is too pricey? Buy it once a fortnight rather than once a week. Don't buy it at all. You'll live and so will your kids.
Cheap meat is NOT, emphatically not, better than no meat. Apart from the ethical issues, the physical consequences for the animals, if we buy cheap meat we are being ripped off. We're not getting a bargain if we buy two chickens for a fiver. We're getting tasteless, watery mush. And then we waste half the bloody thing anyway
The supermarkets play on this. Didn't Somerfield say that there was no point in encouraging free-range chicken production as their customers wouldn't want it? What patronising crap. The supermarkets don't provide us with what we want - we just provide them with the means to sell us what they want. We need to wake up out of our Tesco-sponsored slumber and see what is actually happening - the supermarkets manipulate us, not the other way around.