[quote Nonton]**@livingwithbees
That’s interesting. I must admit, I’m not actually religious but I am interested as a curiosity. Maybe you can tell me more? Why should bible stories not be treated as allegory?
I’m open minded enough to be educated out my impression. It has been a while since I read any bible literature…
So, why don’t you agree that the bible is a root of many legal and social systems? If it’s religion, not the bible, then which text is the religion (in this an Abrahamic ones like Christianity) basing its legal and social systems on? Sure, different denominations of Christianity interpret the bible differently, but it seems like the bible is the base text from where they got their ideas for legal and social systems in the early days, no?
I’ll give a few examples:
- swearing of oaths on the bible (or another religious text). This has changed to reflect a more secular society, but it’s the root of the legal system.
- a census to help organise the social system and it’s resources. I remember once studying about how God ordered a census in the Old Testament, for example.
- in early times the Ten Commandments formed the basis of many legal and social systems. That’s the root it seems.
- even some of the most popular names used come from the bible or another religious text
- Britain still has a head of state that is the monarchy. Sure, they don’t have as much power as the monarchs in the bible, but the bible is pretty much where the concept originated (King David etc). See also the national anthem.
I didn’t think the transition from feral go civilised happened over a weekend
. Admittedly, I’ve not read the peer reviewed literature on how civilisations rise and fall. Any recommendations?
[/quote]
@livingwithbees I’m assuming from the silence to my post that you agree with my impression that the bible text is the root of our legal/social systems?
The bible (a text) being the root makes more sense than religion tbh. Think about how we work now. We have legal literature and then practitioners seek to interpret that literature; the root of the legal and social systems is not the practitioner but the text they are bound to work from.