"Women’s aid and abuse ? . Omg it’s a fucking programme."
I was glad when Women's Aid CEO released a statement, in response to Joe's behaviour:
"Controlling behaviour is never acceptable, and with Love Island viewers complaining to Ofcom in record numbers about Joe’s possessive behaviour towards Lucie, more people are becoming aware of this and want to challenge it.
Abusive relationships often start off with subtle signs of control, so it’s important that it is recognised at an early stage. Love Island viewers are now very vocal in calling out unhealthy behaviour between couples on the show, and this is a positive development,"
I found that really uncomfortable to watch at the time, and I was glad it was pointed out. It doesn't mean that Joe was some awful abuser - just that his controlling behaviour was being recognised, and wasn't allowed to pass as acceptable.
I read it in this [[www.cosmopolitan.com/uk/reports/a28067669/love-island-joe-lucie-controlling-behaviour-womens-aid-warning/
Cosmo article]]
At the end of the article it says:
"The fierce reaction about Joe's behaviour towards Lucie goes to show, then, that programmes like Love Island are going some way to helping young people identify exactly what is healthy and unhealthy in relationships, which can only be a positive thing."
And this is where it's tricky I think
- I've hated Michael's treatment of Amber, and it should be called out.
- When we turn 'real-life' into entertainment, we are messing with real people - in heavily edited shows. It's not reality, and we're messing with people's lives. It's hard on the contestants when they are in there, and when they come out.
Probably the whole concept of the show is flawed now. There must be a more positive way of showing young people what is and what isn't healthy in relationships.