Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Style and beauty

Looking for style advice? Chat all about it here. For the latest discounts on fashion and beauty, sign up for Mumsnet Moneysaver emails.

Who is buying the really expensive handbags and £600 trainers??

231 replies

Newmeagain · 25/03/2026 13:28

I really like clothes and have always splurged on the occasional “investment” item - e.g. nice boots, a jacket from ME&EM that I loved, etc.

But even though I am on a high salary I can’t imagine spending £2000 on a handbag or £600 on fashion trainers that will only last a few months.

I work with lots of women in a professional environment, all earning between £150k/£200k - many don’t have children - and I don’t see any designer items. Mostly mix of standard high street brands plus a bit of Sezane and similar.

So - if you are spending £££, are you earning over £500k or have a partner who does?

OP posts:
Illegally18 · 26/03/2026 22:10

foldinthecheeeeeseeeeeeee · 25/03/2026 13:47

I bought a pair of Hermes sandals last year and they were £790 - I had a huge bonus from work and for once I wanted something for me instead of the house or family.
Disappointed to say they hurt my feet and I have worn them twice lol

how frustrating!

Ceramiq · 27/03/2026 06:35

use92438567 · 26/03/2026 16:40

Right, but my point was in response to this

Luxury goods are about signaling wealth and the perceived status that wealth gives the wearer. Not everyone in this world attaches status to highly visible signals that can be bought by anyone with the cash.

If the average person on the street can't distinguish, the signals aren't highly visible and there's no perceived status involved.

The point of luxury goods is not to wear them around "the average person on the street". Some luxury goods have evolved to be very shouty (fabric that is all over LV or Dior?) but fundamentally they are all designed as a status signifier alone, recognition is the whole point, and that is why people spend such silly amounts of money on them. I'm not inventing anything here, this is extremely widespread knowledge that explains the financial success of the luxury goods industry in the past 25 years. In Europe the market for luxury goods among Europeans has waned as prices have skyrocketed (and interestingly lots of fantastic new brands of beautiful and cheaper clothing and accessories have appeared to meet the more discerning European market) but sales have been strong among Asians and Americans, be that on their home turf or in tourist destinations in Europe. However, the massive Chinese market for luxury goods is beginning to shrink, in particular because the Chinese now know that the "made in Italy" label is largely a lie and that most of the goods are made in Chinese factories and merely finished off in Italy and not worth spending their hard earn cash on - indeed, the Chinese are beginning to realize, like Europeans, that they look foolish when they wear them.

BestZebbie · 27/03/2026 15:47

use92438567 · 26/03/2026 16:40

Right, but my point was in response to this

Luxury goods are about signaling wealth and the perceived status that wealth gives the wearer. Not everyone in this world attaches status to highly visible signals that can be bought by anyone with the cash.

If the average person on the street can't distinguish, the signals aren't highly visible and there's no perceived status involved.

It depends who you are trying to impress!
If you want to gain status from other people who perhaps think flashy/obvious designer stuff is vulgar but spend a lot on themselves at the same sorts of brand, then they will recognise the pieces that the wider public will not.
Just like having an expensive brand of musical instrument/fishing rod/knitting yarn/rubik's cube/whatever will get you status amongst others who are 'in-the-know' but not with the wider world.

suki1964 · 27/03/2026 16:32

Dontgetitt · 26/03/2026 11:19

As my user name says I don't get it. I don't earn £500k but dh does and we have no mortgage etc, I have a lot of savings.

I could easily afford a Chanel bag, but why? It's a bag. But actually it's a blingy status symbol.

I'd far rather spend the cash on business class flights, which some see as a crazy waste of money.

You think you are bad?

I lust over kitchen appliances that I cant afford :)

minieggsrule · 27/03/2026 16:50

Ceramiq · 27/03/2026 06:35

The point of luxury goods is not to wear them around "the average person on the street". Some luxury goods have evolved to be very shouty (fabric that is all over LV or Dior?) but fundamentally they are all designed as a status signifier alone, recognition is the whole point, and that is why people spend such silly amounts of money on them. I'm not inventing anything here, this is extremely widespread knowledge that explains the financial success of the luxury goods industry in the past 25 years. In Europe the market for luxury goods among Europeans has waned as prices have skyrocketed (and interestingly lots of fantastic new brands of beautiful and cheaper clothing and accessories have appeared to meet the more discerning European market) but sales have been strong among Asians and Americans, be that on their home turf or in tourist destinations in Europe. However, the massive Chinese market for luxury goods is beginning to shrink, in particular because the Chinese now know that the "made in Italy" label is largely a lie and that most of the goods are made in Chinese factories and merely finished off in Italy and not worth spending their hard earn cash on - indeed, the Chinese are beginning to realize, like Europeans, that they look foolish when they wear them.

This is superior, judgemental, clap trap which makes you look rather “silly” and “foolish”.

HotSoupBowl · 27/03/2026 21:41

Honestly I think people just like what they like. I’d only go as far as the odd jewellery piece but even then under £500. I’d sooner spend on tech.
I’ve considered bags but honestly I’m happy with my Marc Jacobs and it’s more my style.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread