I mean I think it’s naive to think that the RF are progressive and modern.
They’re an institution that are thoroughly British and have outlived their European counterparts. Their longevity did not come about by mistake.
The British Royal family’s rule is orchestrated and built on mystique. The pomp, ceremony and protocol are all part of the magic and mystique. It’s the British traditions and history that make them what they are
Meghan entering as some 21st century Grace Kelly is all good and well but it’s a risk. Everyone else plays it safe and has been for centuries. Even Diana did, it wasn’t until her marriage was in tatters that she stopped living the charade.
I don’t think the RF want a Princess that is going rogue. They absolutely need to be reigned in - do you think that they want her galvinising the globe in private jets ? When their spending is the main source of contention with the British public ?
The harry speech that she so clearly wrote was more of her left wing ideals infiltrating the institution. Raising money for charities under the guise of a royal baby shower is Oprah not royal. All these things in themselves are subtle but put Them all together and you have a brand that looks very Duchess of Sunset Boulevard and refl fte poorly on Harry and BRF. It takes away from the seriousness of the institution.
Regardless of what you think, there is clearly and undoubtedly discord between the family. The photo of her poking her head from the back of family on balcony with Kate stood proudly at front said it all.