It's not fair to roundly castigate posters who read the 'evidence' based on the California reports, though. The reports are well written, by eminent scientists and appear to be at the root of the US law making. Why wouldn't anyone quote them when evidence is discussed? They seem to be a legitimate voice.
That those who have looked deeper, taken more notice of the methodology and specific wording of the reports know it is, for the most part, sleight of hand at best, outright lies as interpreted, is, sadly, par for the course.
I am also sceptical about posts like Redzer because, living with a vaper, I know that the vape smell dissipates really quickly and, whilst a few vapers together will cause a sweet smelling fug, it isn't foul and doesn't cause any problems, like perfume... which can have me in breathless tears.
Not saying I don't believe you Redzer just that your experience does not match my own, and I am one of those miserable toads who hates strong smells and is often forced to leave rooms because of them.
But the bottom line is that vaping is far, far safer than smoking and demonising it threatens its wider acceptance.