Hi.
I've read the replies over the last couple of hours or so, and taken it all in. I have a few things I want to say about it all and an update. It will be long. TL/DR - then why are you bothering with this thread?
First, I know from my post, it seems like my DC aren't being cared for/needs met/welfare supported but that couldn't be further from the truth. All the DC - Steps included, have extra needs. That means, they all have attributes that affect other people, struggle with societal expectations, behaviours, and mental health - all in their own unique, and sometimes challenging ways. These things phase out, come and go, or disappear completely.
Whilst I feel things have gone too far, which is why I reached out, I still feel I have given my DC very good and strong support, my SC good and strong support, and I still stand by my decision to blend our families because at the time, nothing like this was remotely evident. The same can be said for my DH when we blended families - no children are predictable, and when all DC were young, they loved each other, loved each other's company, and it genuinely was very lovely. Things change when DC grow into teens. Some children find the transitional phases of the teenage years more challenging than others. That's without the addition of additional needs, toxic parents, or blended families.
To anyone who thinks people shouldn't have blended families, God forbid your DP should ever leave you and you should ever fall in love with someone who has children.
I have made mistakes. I have sometimes been less of a parent than I should have been. But I defy any of you to be able to tell anyone, hand on heart, that you're a perfect parent.
My child who moved out (DC2) - I will always carry guilt, but it wasn't as straightforward as them leaving because of SC/overcrowding the house. They have always struggled to be part of a large household - even before DSC were on the scene as visiting kids (with nobody moved in) DC2 grew up with very challenging behaviour, and with a father who refused to engage, despite DC2s desperation for his bio Dad. As I did state, the last few years they grew closer and found more common ground as DC2 grew up, so whilst I will always feel sad that DC2 isn't here, I would have made the same choice without SC being here. DC2 is 100% happier where they are now. Close to College, has a job, close to grandparents who are still alive, and even has friends in the town (had none in my town) To give context to how challenging the behaviour had been, DC1 and DC3 don't want to see DC2 currently, because everything DC2 did was directed at them. I see DC2 regularly, and DC2 calls DH weekly.
I find it odd that DC2 going to live with bio Dad isn't acceptable to people, but maybe I didn't give enough back story?
Kids are individuals, and my other SCs relationship and experience with their bio Dad is quite different to their siblings one. Their bio Dad feels an affinity with DC2, because he sees similar traits to when he was growing up. DC2 is the only child he can truly relate to. So, in short, he is a decent father to DC2 and an inadequate one to the rest of his children. It's not exactly ideal, it's dysfunctional, but it always has been. DC2 had long been having week long stays at bio Dad's on their own out of choice. If SC moved out tomorrow, DC2 would still not be coming back. DC2 wore me down to the bone after my mother died. I needed bio Dad to step up. So did the siblings. Regardless of SC.
Regarding SC - there is no physical danger. SC is not biologically male. I'm also not a helpless feeble person, I am quite capable, as a mother of four, all with additional needs, of handling a meltdown of any magnitude. But there is no physical threat.
I'll tell you how I saw it. My DH didn't leave when my DC2 was making everyone miserable. He stayed. He still hasn't abadoned DC2 even noe, when he could easily pare it back. I needed DC2s stepmum and bio Dad to step up and support them, so what kind of person would I be if I wasn't willing to do the same?
I also saw a child in need. A child who had been controlled by a parent. my DH being helpless. the bio Mum lying to cover her tracks so even extended family couldn't help because they didn't know. I couldn't not help them. I had hoped for better support. From DH. From Social Services. But guess what? SS did jack shit. They signed everything off because SC was safe from harm and that was that.
My DC have a very strong relationship with me - we talk all the time and the only mistake I have ever made is not making DH accountable for his child's actions.
I should have told him more..I should have pressed issues and I should have forced him to sort things out.
I issued an ultimatum. That's why I've been silent for a few days. I laid out exactly where the massive cracks are and what he needs to do to fix them. I have told him that things cannot go on this way, with my DC being so affected and if things do not change, he and SC will have to leave. At first, his reaction was disbelief, protecting his SC, and not really understanding where I was coming from. As I mentioned in my last update, he was a bit recriminatory. But I pushed him. I made it very clear. Grey rock I think they call it. I told him I loved him, but that the situation is untenable and cannot carry on.
I have spoken to my DC. DC1 said, whilst they find some aspects of SCs behaviour irritating (relating to dramatics) they've been through a lot. DC1 said that a bunch of their friends have so many issues, and loads of people give up on them, so they are glad I didn't. They felt that DC2 was much worse, affected them much more, because DC2 targeted people. DC3, my child who really befriended SC, said that problems like this aren't worth him losing what he called "The best father I could want" and even though he found it horrifying what SC divulged to him, he understands SC and even though sometimes finds them overwhelming, people make mistakes. DC4 was more conflicted. DC4 doesn't get along with SC much - they don't fight, but they have no common ground. DC4 has a strong relationship with DH, they spend a lot of time making music together and hanging out. DC4 bounty said, in an ideal world, SC wouldn't live with us, but DH would stay.
As SCs bio Mum is not allowed to have any contact with SC, there is no additional family support.
I think someone on this thread tried to imply DH carried out the SA on SC rather than the bio mum. I've nothing to say on that front. If I defend him, it won't mean anything to the people who have decided that is the narrative. But, I know it was the bio Mum. Because SC2 & SC3 have told the same story about her to me. I reported it, Police showed up to their school, talked to them, and established there was no current risk because the children didn't disclose anything. They were put on a CIN by SS, but very sadly, they didn't disclose anything with further discussions. As SS can't ask leading questions, it was closed eventually. Bio Mum got character references from all her med professional friends and the Headteacher (they are friends IRL - have parties together) and as SC2 & SC3 present well, because they are coached by their mother - nothing further could be done to protect them. Apparently, we are "free to report any concerns in the future".
Although they did note that SC3 was being coached from bio Mum to feign symptoms of a disorder. Which was challenged.
It's all ever so complicated. And ever so difficult.
The outcome is this:
my therapist is going to support me by ensuring I am communicating properly with DH
DH is going to do better - if he doesn't, him and SC are going to move in with his Mum.
I have done a referral to mental health support for DC4, and DC3 already has support at their school.
SC already has CAMHS support, and I have asked DHs mum to pay for private therapy for EMDR. Someone on the thread mentioned it. I have had it myself, so I know that it's effective for traumas. I can't believe I didn't think of it myself.
I'm putting the last of my faith into DH to sort his shit out. I haven't given him a time limit, but my gut feeling is, if things haven't dramatically improved by Christmas, then DH and SC will have to leave.