I have a DD y11 with a (very new) EHCP. Due to her stage of education we have had the annual review meeting this week though it has only been in place a couple of months.
Dd is autistic, has ADHD and is highly anxious. Despite this she has been able to take on a full set of GCSEs, has done very well in recent mocks, is very well behaved and well liked by her teachers. Her effort grades are high, she is well behaved.
The SENCO has been a difficult person to deal with throughout. He is abrasive and defensive and I don't like him. Despite this I was approaching the review meeting positively, my perception was that DD had more support in place, this was having a positive effect. The execution isn't perfect, but overall there was a lot to celebrate. I appreciate the efforts of the staff and of my daughter.
So the meeting happens, DD is at school with SENCO and TA, me and DH join virtually from home. There is a long discussion of post 16 options, a heavy emphasis on looking at other 6 forms/ colleges. Discussion of the A levels she would like to do all ok.
Then the teacher comments report is brought out and has not been shared with us prior. So we are trying to read it on a shared screen. Some concerns from teachers - comments about DD being "very very worried" and visibly anxious in class, lots of positive comments about progress as well. Then the discussion is hi-jacked by the TA/ SENCO saying DD is sometimes rude to TAs trying to help DD in class. This has not been discussed with us beforehand, no warning and no concrete examples. Just a very blunt criticism.
Unsurprisingly this floors DD, she is already visibly anxious in the meeting and uncomfortable. She tries to apologise and is not sure what they mean. No context or examples are given so she is not sure how to respond. Me and DH are witnessing our daughter dissolve into tears and distress on screen. We try to intervene, saying how inappropriate this is as DD has a social communication disorder ffs - she needs support and a much kinder approach. Constructive criticism is fine - that was not constructive and I cannot think what they wanted to achieve. If they wanted to upset us and DD then they did!
The SENCO responded to our saying this was inappropriate by saying he disagrees, without explanation. He doubles down on saying DD comes over as rude, again without any examples or suggestions for what she could do instead of whatever it is they are saying is rude!
Dd is allowed to leave so she can return to her maths lesson, still crying at this point, we have tried to offer reassurance over the screen.
My husband has to leave to go to a meeting. I am left with dickhead the SENCO to finish with a rush through of the changes the school has made to the text of the EHCP.
He hastily alters on screen while I am watching a paragraph where they have added a line saying DD is rude to the TAs, changing the wording to inadvertently abrupt sometimes. I am then completely aware that the criticism wasn't a poor choice of words in error but premeditated. It is so disheartening.
I left the meeting having lost all confidence in the SENCO, despite the fact that there has been progress since DD got her EHCP. I feel sad for DD who had a very difficult day but stayed in school and went in today.
The SENCO literally shat on a meeting that should have been positive! Wtf.