Please or to access all these features

SN children

Here are some suggested organisations that offer expert advice on special needs.

Spastic

125 replies

lou33 · 02/10/2004 16:47

Ok, now it's really really getting to me atm, the amount of times I am hearing this word used as a form of humour, to take the piss out of other people etc. Some of you might remember my tirade against Richard Curtis (thank you everyone who joined in with that) for using it in Love Actually. And recently I wrote to the editor at the Daily Telegraph about an article regarding the paralypmics, and one journalist's viewpoint that it wasn't worth the airspace (no reply from them, but lots of letters printed agreeing with the journo in question, interestingly enough)

Now I've rattled off another email to channel 4 and ofcom, about the tv programme "Make me a perfect wife". Did anyone notice one of the husbands calling his wife a spastic? Icing on the cake, as dh was sitting next to a bunch of people in a pub at the weekend listening to them calling each other spastics, and doing their version of impersonations.

I am so sick and tired of people thinking it is ok to insult and make fun of disabled people. Bet Channel 4 wouldn't dream of lettting racist or religious abuse through , so why are disabled people fair game? I could possibly understand it, if the programme was about the ignorant attitudes of certain parts of society today, but it wasn't at all relevent to the programme itself.

Anyway, if anyone had read this far, and wants to see what I wrote, here it is:

"I am writing regarding the first programme of the above series and to register a complaint.

Can you please tell me why Channel 4, while filming the lives of these people, running it through editing, and checking for final viewing, allowed, or thought it acceptable to include a speech from one of the husbands, in which he calls his wife a spastic? Is it amusing, clever? Were you trying to make him look a fool? Whatever your reasons I am greatly offended.

As a mother of a 3 1/2 year old son, who has cerebral palsy , spastic diplegia, I find it incomprehensible, that in this day and age, there are still people and tv companies, who are willing to use this sort of language as a form of humour. My son struggles every day to do the most basic things. He has only recently learned to sit without lots of support, he cannot stand at all, or walk,he is in a wheelchair, he can only crawl when not using it. He is highly intelligent, and talks all the time about how when he is bigger he is going to walk like his daddy, and play football. He struggles to do things even the very youngest toddlers can do without thinking, yet he is a charming, bright, humourous little soul, who bears no malice to anyone. Would someone from the channel 4 team like to pay a visit to my house, and spend some time with myself and my son, then maybe I could have an explanation as to why including the word spastic in the show was seen as a legitimate source of entertainment?

You may say it is relevent to show what sort of character this man has, but no, it isn't. It has nothing at all to do with the subject of the series, and would have made no difference at all to the way the programme ran, if you had just edited it out.

I am sick and tired of hearing this phrase bandied about, as though people with this type of cerebral palsy, and their families, are unimportant. You wouldn't dare let a racist comment slip through, or a religious attack, for fear of complaints, so how dare you feel it acceptable to make fun of disabled people. My son didn't choose to have cerebral palsy, he should be entitled to have an equal life to those of the non disabled, and that includes not having such ignorant and offensive comments used in everyday life, because of something which is not a lifestyle choice.

I will be contacting Ofcom as well."

Maybe it is our fault for not pulling people up on it when we have the chance. Maybe we should all try and point out that this is unacceptable when we hear these kind of offensive comments. Dh says to his utter shame he said nothing, because there were many in the group, all drunk, and he was quite frankly worried as to how they would react.

Thanks for reading my rant if you have got this far.

Heartily pissed off lou33

OP posts:
lou33 · 16/10/2004 01:25

Blimey no I didn't. I haven't even heard of the programme.

sighs....

OP posts:
eidsvold · 16/10/2004 02:04

good for you Lou - nice to get a positive reply - I would also pitch the idea someone suggested re: a tv docu about offensive terms and their impact etc...

lou33 · 16/10/2004 02:09

I will Eidsvold, I am going to have a think about everything I want to say over the weekend.

Keep up the daily news for me please

OP posts:
Saker · 16/10/2004 20:32

Well done, superbly worded letter! I'm really pleased you got a result.

I was angry watching "Have I got news for you last night?" (which I usually avoid) for the usual predictable jokes about David Blunkett being blind. Again why is this acceptable? And it's not even as if there isn't sufficient political material to work with as far as David Blunkett is concerned.

lou33 · 16/10/2004 22:40

I know Saker, there are some people who will go for the lowest shot whenever possible. A lot of reeducating to do out there.

OP posts:
alexsmum · 16/10/2004 23:16

I have read several posts over the months that have mentioned India Knight and her columns.I have just read her book 'My life on a plate' and she is outrageously guilty of this..using inappropriate words as insults and for comic effect.Off the top of my head I can recall that in this slim book she used the words'spastic'(several times)retarded, and in a paragraph about spilling food on one's clothes she used the phrase 'me and my downs syndrome'.
I thought it was absolutely unnecessary and I think that perhaps she should be next for a letter lou.

jojo38 · 17/10/2004 10:57

There are people out there who are just so ignorant. It isn't an excuse... it's a disability!

alexsmum · 17/10/2004 11:01

bump

SueW · 17/10/2004 11:16

This reply has been withdrawn

This has been withdrawn by MNHQ at OP's request.

SueW · 17/10/2004 11:25

This reply has been withdrawn

This has been withdrawn by MNHQ at OP's request.

lou33 · 17/10/2004 12:49

When is this on Sue? I might have to give it a watch.

Am, I haven't read the book, which means I would have to do so first before I could write to her. Should I read it or would it just get steam coming out of my ears?

OP posts:
lou33 · 17/10/2004 12:52

Also, has anyone heard of a new film out now? Called inside I am dancing, about 2 disabled young men, one with cp and one with muscular dystrophy. It's on my list to see.

Did I mention earlier ,that my contact at Scope wants me to talk to someone in another department regarding all my reducating letters? Not entirely sure what about though.

OP posts:
glitterfairy · 17/10/2004 12:59

You have really made me think Lou. I agree it is coming back and yes I have not often challenged it but then I challenge so many things and get into trouble! I will start but have to say that even challenging racism is hard. When I overhear a racist remark I do challenge now wherever I am on the train or in the park as I hear some white girls singing a song about "niggers" the other day. It doesnt make me popular but I think when we dont challenge we allow society to think this is ok.

lou33 · 17/10/2004 13:00

I agree with everything you say glitter.

OP posts:
glitterfairy · 17/10/2004 13:02

Marvellous I have a horrible cold and am wrapping a present for my kids to take to a party and I am coherent there is a first! Take care Lou

glitterfairy · 17/10/2004 13:03

PS Inside I am dancing looks really good I am going to see it.

lou33 · 17/10/2004 13:04
Grin
OP posts:
SueW · 17/10/2004 13:30

This reply has been withdrawn

This has been withdrawn by MNHQ at OP's request.

lou33 · 17/10/2004 13:47

Thanks

OP posts:
alexsmum · 17/10/2004 17:33

sue-w, not sure what your opinion is of the thing called love programme, but i didn't think this was offensive .The character with cerebal palsy was challenging the ideas of his family who felt that he should not have sexual feelings or use his body in a sexual way because of his cerebal palsy.They were giving him grief in a kind of 'this is sick' way and he came out with that as a retort..It wasn't done in a thoughtless, insulting way.It was more in a challenging 'people say this kind of thing 'way.iyswim.

alexsmum · 17/10/2004 17:34

lou, not sure about the book. I think you might end up getting angry, because it was used A LOT

alexsmum · 17/10/2004 17:34

lou, not sure about the book. I think you might end up getting angry, because it was used A LOT

lou33 · 17/10/2004 19:22
Sad
OP posts:
Davros · 18/10/2004 18:27

Just caught up on this. That film Inside I'm Dancing has caused a LOT of controversy because the two disabled characters are played by non-disabled actors and this has upset a lot of people in the disabilty world.
Well done Lou. I did read the beginning of this ages ago and meant to say "go on, send the letter" but I'm way out of date and you got a great result. What are C4 going to give you as compensation? First go with George Clooney next time they interview him (fighting off Coddy of course)!

lou33 · 18/10/2004 18:33

She can have him I want Hugh Jackman.

I read an interview with the bloke who made Inside Im dancing, and actually I can see what he is getting at. He said that although he would have liked to use disabled actors, there aren't that many around with cp or muscular dystrophy with the combination of the right look and acting ability. I doubt the film would have been made if he waited for the right disabled actor to come along, and it appears to have done a good job at showing disabled people as human beings (tho of course I would have to see it, but from all the articles I have read I mean). It gets 4 stars in the sunday times film review

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page