yes - if you do get a dx, on the avail evidence, diplegia would be sensible as it sounds as though only her legs are affected. (whether 'spastic' or not depends on the muscle tone difficulties - spastic tends to refer to the muscle tone being too high/ tight)
dd2 was dx spastic quad originally (also from birth hypoxia) as her whole body was affected. she spent 5 weeks in scbu/ tube fed etc. despite the obvious (she received high rate dla from 6 mos and had physio/ slt from birth) we didn't get a formal dx until she was nearly two. that said, it was pretty obvious she had cp from months old. they just didn't tell us...
dd2 had frequent hip x-rays to monitor formation etc (as she was not weight bearing the 'cups' were quite shallow, so it is important to get weight bearing to promtoe this formation - pt gave us a standing frame very early - at 12 months, she got it on her birthday lol
and she progressed to using a walking frame eventually until the end of yr r. she's fully mobile now, except she uses a wheelchair for distance or if we're on a tiring day out. she's 7 now.
dd2 also had strabismus surgery this summer
- she's had a squint (alternating converging) from about 3mos old. when we took her for the first eye appointments, i asked if the squint was anything to do with her difficult birth/ delays (remember we weren't calling it cp then lol) and i wa told no. absolutely not. this is not linked.
they were, of course, completely wrong.
over the last 7 years we have seen many different opth consultants (we move a lot) who have refused to do surgery, because the squint will be caused by poor muscle tone caused by her cp, and surgery would be pointless. very different from the first consultant, who said, nothing to do with it, we'll operate when she's 18mos, the sooner the better.
anyway, the surgery this summer was very successful
the new consultant decided that the squint was caused by cp (no kidding) but that the treatment was the sdame for kids with or without cp, and so the surgery needed doing asap, as at 7 she was a late candidate for an attempt to get binocular vision in any case.
she's worn glasses to try and correct it since before she was 2 - she's still wearing them now, but the actual squint is miles better.
anyway - dd2 is 7, walks, talks (we were told she wouldn't do either) although she is a little stumbly and a little slurry, skis (it costs a bleeding fortune) and has an iq of 142 (apparently... we had to prove she had no learning disabilities and the ed psych came up with a whole load of new problems revolving about bright kids that can't use a pencil lol). i only tell you that because, really, she's a normal kid who just happens to have a brain injury that makes life a bit more tricky.
no idea if any of this resonates with you - been on auto-blah 