"By the sound of it you have been doing everything absolutely right, and she is a happy, secure baby as a result, it's just a shame you are now trying to teach her to do something which goes completely against her nature and both of your instincts, and which is utterly unneccessary"
So are you saying, greenmonkies, that a baby can only be happy & secure if held to sleep & not left to self settle? Because that is what it sounds like!
Dd1 [5] always slept on us as a young baby. She was our only child & we had all the time in the world to hold her after feed/bath etc. Putting her down once she was sleeping deeply, or sometimes just holding her until her next feed.
Dd2 [15 weeks] will be held, but no matter how deeply asleep she is, as soon as we put her down, she wakes. Whether held for 5 minutes or an hour! So, she goes to bed awake, mostly half asleep, but deff awake to some degree. I sit on my bed, next to her bassinet with dd1 in our bed & I read to them both. Dd2 has slept 7-7 [or 6-6, or 8-8 depending on our day] from 7 weeks.
They are both as happy and secure as each other & dd2 is certainly no less happy/secure than dd1 was at that age.
And I don't see what is wrong with expecting a 5yr old to got to sleep by themselves. Dd will have a story & chat to herself & fall asleep happily. My girls mean the world to me, but I cannot sit with them, at 5 yrs until they fall asleep...to me, that it just too dependant.