Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Site stuff

Join our Innovation Panel to try new features early and help make Mumsnet better.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

nickname changes : thoughts?

276 replies

JJmumsnet · 06/06/2005 18:09

Hi All,

We've been discussing the name changing thing internally recently as it happens, both because of the ability to use it to cause trouble and just as importantly because of the possibility that any new poster may be a name changer or the same person posting under multiple names, which inevitably leads to an atmosphere of suspicion.

As Marina has elsewhere rightly pointed out, the number of users, threads and name changes makes it hard to keep up with who's just having fun (by far the majority) and who's trying to cause trouble.

We've raised before the notion of restricting names to two per registration, with the idea that you have one name for everyday use and a further one for sensitive stuff. We believe this is the way to go now.

Of course it won't stop the ability to troll if you are determined, but it will make it more difficult to cause trouble and to confuse. We know some people enjoy having some perfectly innocent fun with name changing and we're sorry to be party poopers in that respect but on balance we think limiting name changes is the sensible thing to do. Were anyone to desperately want/need another name for a pressing reason, we'd happily facilitate on an ad hoc basis and I'm sure Tech could do a special Christmas namechange facility too.

As mumsnet grows (as we hope it might ) it's going to become even more of an issue to keep track of things, so we hope you agree the limit is the right way to go. Tech's away this week (again you cry!) but we'll get onto it soon. Naturally if you have objections/ reasons why you think this is a bad idea - do post them here or write to us directly and we'll give it further thought.

Thanks,
Team mumsnet

OP posts:
hunkermunker · 06/06/2005 22:22

Rickman, I agree with you.

Think it should be called ArseyNet some days

rickman · 06/06/2005 22:23

Message withdrawn

giraffeski · 06/06/2005 22:27

Message withdrawn

tamum · 06/06/2005 22:42

That is an excellent suggestion BattyBat (or giraffeski if she manages to get in first, smarm smarm).

giraffeski · 06/06/2005 22:43

Message withdrawn

tamum · 06/06/2005 22:44

Here you go : -o-o-

rickman · 06/06/2005 22:44

Message withdrawn

zebraZ · 06/06/2005 22:46

what if you could get a random name assigned to you for sensitive threads, you could only use that sensitive name for 30 days (or something).

Naw, forget it, I'm talking rubbish.

Waves "hello"! at tamum & rickman.

rickman · 06/06/2005 22:47

Message withdrawn

tamum · 06/06/2005 22:47

Actually you're right rickman (I seem to be spending all day being sycophantic). I thought it would signal name changes used for troublemaking, but I suppose if it was like eBay you would get them for changed names or new names, so it wouldn't really help.

tamum · 06/06/2005 22:48

Hello zebra Nice to see you back with a you-sounding name.

rickman · 06/06/2005 22:49

Message withdrawn

zebraZ · 06/06/2005 22:52

I think I should change my name to "FailureAtFlouncing", or somesuch.
I will email MN sometime about getting zebra back... i scuppered registration & hasn't bothered to grovel for it back.

giraffeski · 07/06/2005 00:49

Message withdrawn

giraffeski · 07/06/2005 00:50

Message withdrawn

anorak · 07/06/2005 08:31

I can't see why it's so difficult for some people to keep nastiness and insensitivity out of their posts. Most posters do this all the time.

And despite what Justine and blu said, I'm for outing anyone who's posted nasty, bitchy stuff - first give them the opportunity to explain themself and if they don't - why not name them? It'd be a fantastic incentive for people to refrain from that kind of anonymous bitchiness. I reckon it would cut the troublesome posts down to a fraction of what they are now.

RTKangaMummy · 07/06/2005 09:23

IMHO I think the limit will be unfair on those who have access to only one computer

The members who use mumsnet at work and at home can have 4 nicknames can't they

Or am I wrong?

That doesn't seem fair to me anyway.

I don't understand why people want to be nasty anyway

BattyBat · 07/06/2005 09:34

The glasses (or some other identifying mark) would be just for a changed name, not newly registered. In my fantasy world, on the profile you'd have 1 registered name and a box for aliases. The registered name can't be changed (other than by requesting it from MN Towers) but if you tick the "use my alias" box on the profile, you get the sunglasses and post under the changed name. Obviously it doesn't have to be sunglasses, just asterisks before the name would work too.

It would remove the suspicion of new posters because it would be obvious that it was a changeling.

BattyBat · 07/06/2005 09:35

I don't think so RTKangaMummy, I assume it would be 2 aliases per registered name.

RTKangaMummy · 07/06/2005 09:37

Battybat

Good idea

Then newbies will be saved from all the nastiness that sometimes greets them

WigWamBam · 07/06/2005 09:37

It'll all be immaterial to me, because once the party-pooping happens, I don't think I'll be around anywhere near as much.

One thing that I like about this site over all the others is the fact that it's very free and easy. Almost anything goes, and most people respect and appreciate that. Removing the facility to change names for a bit of fun seems like a step towards turning MN into another one of those fluffy, sanitised, dull parenting sites where you can't even fart without someone coming down on you like a ton of bricks.

We're not children who need keeping under control; we are adults who should be able to have civilised discussions without resorting to insults and spiteful comments made under changed names. The fact that one or two posters can't do this is the problem of those posters, not the rest of us, and I agree with Anorak et al that giving fair warning and then naming and shaming those posters would cut down on those posts.

cod · 07/06/2005 09:37

Message withdrawn

RTKangaMummy · 07/06/2005 09:38

XXXXX posts

Hope that is right otherwise totally unfair IMHO anyway

RTKangaMummy · 07/06/2005 09:41

I think the naming/shaming threat is the best cos I really can't see why anyone wants to be nasty anyway

Perhaps I don't read the threads that people are talking about

RTKangaMummy · 07/06/2005 09:42

WWB well said