Ajollygoodwrap - I did not start a "Thread About A Thread" (TAAT) here. This is a request for clarification of a Thread Deletion Message.
"It's a bloody free site and chat forum."
Maybe you have decided not to pay for Premium Membership in order to keep Mumsnet running but some of us have:
www.mumsnet.com/Talk/site_stuff/3878378-Premium-Membership-Privacy-and-Data-Protection-MNHQ-please-clarify?msgid=95683430
"I know I would jog on if I was so frothy about how a site's been run"
I suggest you do so then, as no one else is foaming at the mouth quite as rabidly here 
Z0rr0 - I agree about the baffling "billions" thing. To claim that "we're getting a billion reports" is childishly hyperbolic and just adds to the staggeringly offensive trivialisation of a very serious issue.
ItsLateHumpty - "I also thought MN had moved away from allowing reports from non-members, so who are the ‘billions’ that complained? Or are we being mod’ed by non-members still?"
Mumsnet has previously reassured us that "external monitors" are not an issue - but that hardly chimes with the "billions" claim:
@JustineMumsnet said
"I just want to pick up on the idea that we simply remove stuff because it's reported by non-members or single issue activists and that this happens a lot. In fact we've had zero reports on trans issues by email since the beginning of the year.
And when posts are reported we look at the post in context and apply our guidelines to decide whether or not it warrants deletion. Posts on both sides of the trans/ womens' rights debate are reported overwhelmingly by long-standing mumsnet members who are active on the site. When it's clear that people are reporting vexatiously on posts that do not require deletion we deal with that appropriately, and we have banned people who are only here to promote a single issue or to censor the conversation around a single issue.
Ultimately our aim is to consider only one thing though, whether posts are made within our guidelines and if they're not, they go."
www.mumsnet.com/Talk/site_stuff/3874618-Mumsnet-Premium-membership-please-support-us-if-you-can?msgid=95471726#95471726
That reassurance is completely at odds with the Thread Deletion Message I am asking about:
Message from MNHQ: Lads, we're getting a billion reports and tbh, we're not sure that we're the place for this. How about thrashing it all out somewhere else? We're going to remove this thread now. Love and peace, MNHQ.
www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/3907094-Comerfords-style-on-Twitter
In particular:
". . . when posts are reported we look at the post in context. . . . When it's clear that people are reporting vexatiously on posts that do not require deletion we deal with that appropriately, we have banned people who are only here to promote a single issue or to censor the conversation around a single issue.
Ultimately our aim is to consider only one thing though, whether posts are made within our guidelines and if they're not, they go."
The "context" is, as I have explained in my OP:
"a sustained campaign that has included "economic sanctions", blocking (a Mumsnet member's) receipt of donations from Mumsnetters when she was in dire financial straights. . .
. . . b) about a young woman being persecuted, primarily by a gang of males led by a man."
Precisely because I wanted to avoid this being perceived as a TAAT, I did not mention the details of this attack as part of a wider campaign "to censor the conversation around a single issue".
For the benefit of anyone who missed the deleted thread - but please do NOT pick up the conversation in this thread - the "single issue conversation" being censored is the desperate need for emotional and practical support for detransitioners.