Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Site stuff

Join our Innovation Panel to try new features early and help make Mumsnet better.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Hide poster facility (again)

98 replies

SagaNorenLanskrimMalmo · 20/12/2015 17:28

More than ever I feel the need for this. Is the HQ position still the same?

OP posts:
Pipistrella · 22/12/2015 08:32

I can totally see the points against it. Ok, well maybe we don't need this - though I like the idea of hiding some people's threads, if that would work.

I think we need something though. We could try the colours thing maybe, then we'd still see what they wrote but mentally we would have put a star next to it to remind us not to take it to heart or whatever.

No one else would know about that.

Edith I sympathise - I instigated the cycling topic and there was masses of support for it, and then they put it in 'In the Club' and I think people can't find it and think it's a closed club iyswim. It's really quiet

Sparklingbrook · 22/12/2015 09:00

I think I will just carry on as I do now. Ignoring threads started by some OPs and hiding threads if they turn up mid thread.

In RL if someone is really annoying I do stop engaging.

RatSandmIce · 22/12/2015 09:26

Just adding a small futile vote for a hide poster button.

ShowOfHands · 22/12/2015 10:50

I vote no.

We're a community and we're marked out by the simplicity of using our words. To support, celebrate, joke, inform, advise. I think it's a strength that the unwanted twattery is challenged through words or simply ignored. Hiding a poster might only be seen as the choice of an individual but it's a representation of the site, a part of what MN is and how it works. And as mature, witty and lovely people I'm sure we encounter wazzocks at work, in our own families and in schools. I teach my DC to deal with them. They have to rise above it and maintain their own standards. They can ignore the harm they do without locking them in a cupboard.

It smacks of terrible ego in some ways. MN is made up of all sorts of people. The faint distaste still felt in the mention of mouldies feels similar to this. Selective, absolute, restrictive. Childish too.

If somebody feels hounded by another poster then it's not a matter for hiding but for banning.

A function isn't just peculiar to a poster. It's a signpost of the interaction we encourage on the site as a whole. That interaction is negative imho.

OliviaMumsnet · 22/12/2015 11:08

Hello hello to you all
I don't have anything exciting to add.
But wanted to say hohoho merry Christmas

Pipistrella · 22/12/2015 11:25

Nice post Showy but I don't think it's necessarily a childish thing to want a physical marker to assist with the mental filtering we all do.

Some of us might find it harder than others to deal with large amounts of information; this is a peculiar weakness of mine, I can't process things very quickly, and thus having a paperclip or a sticker or something to keep my paperwork in order in everyday life is really important (though I often fail to do it)

It's the same thing; some have a remarkable ability to remember everything and everyone. People often comment on threads in the manner of 'I remember your posts from last summer when you had that argument with your mum' or whatever - I'm always baffled as to how they know, particularly when there have been namechanges in between.

I can't do it. Therefore a visual reminder, in the form of a colour or something, well, yes it does feel slightly distasteful but OTOH it would be quite useful.

I'm not thinking of applying it to everyone I ever disagree with. Just those who are maybe on my' suspicious' list, those who post continuous reams of political bollocks stuff and the conspiracy theorists, who don't warrant a ban, but are nevertheless really blimming annoying.

Plus sometimes, just sometimes, I do want to lock someone in a metaphorical cupboard, because I know I might say something I regret unless I do.

By and large I agree with your sentiments though. I wish there were a way; perhaps there isn't a good way. I feel like MN is just too big and too scary for me these days.

So I should probably just leave.

Pipistrella · 22/12/2015 11:26

Oh hello! Happy Christmas to you too Brew

ShowOfHands · 22/12/2015 12:14

You should NOT leave. It's the desire to better the place which marks you out. You want to use it positively. It is bigger. It isn't better. AIBU all on its own has ensured that.

It isn't in essence childish no. Not at all. There are days I yearn for it as a function. Those days I walk away. It would be used childishly though. At times. It would be another weapon to wield. It's whose hands it's in which is the problem. And the PBPs would rejoin or we'd be hacked and lists of who banned whom would appear or MN would break briefly and it'd break down and we'd have cried of well it doesn't work, let's have post counts instead or different colours for length of service, let's ban namechanging. And you tinker and tinker and tinker and in the end the place is unrecognizable and still the witless dingbats march across the board.

While there's a WWW, the wazzocks will come. They're everywhere. I am determined to just get on with my life and my MN habit talking to people I like.

If I believed it would be positive for the site, I really would back it.

ShowOfHands · 22/12/2015 12:15

And a jolly happy Christmas to you lovely Olivia.

Sparklingbrook · 22/12/2015 12:19

Maybe concentrate on getting rid of the emojis first. They seem to have arrived without consultation at all.

Meanwhile I can still ignore posters without hiding them.

Thurlow · 22/12/2015 12:22

How would the increased colour coding work? If most users already have two colours, one for the OP and one for them, are you thinking that you then start tagging other posters in other colours?

DoesntLeftoverTurkeySoupDragOn · 22/12/2015 12:30

I tend to work on the assumption that if I don't recognise a poster as being on my "shit list" then they are probably not being annoying. Sometimes I'll think someone sounds familiar and advanced search their name over the last month or so. Sometimes this results in a lightbulb moment and it move on.

Pipistrella · 22/12/2015 12:45

Showy you're very wise and a lot of that makes good sense. In fact all of it does.

I can be philosophical at times, but at other times I am a mess of reactionary, hormonal misunderstanding and it's then that I forget to walk away - and also when I am at my own most dangerous, I suppose!

So it's not just the wazzocks' fault. It's us folk who are bad at dealing with them Smile

Sometimes I would hide my own posts if I could.

It does occur to me though that if it was all so easy, we wouldn't need a hide thread option either. And I don't think anyone finds that a bad thing?

Though that's probably because it isn't so personal and is a sort of overarching thing which meets the boundaries already in place - ie, it hides one thread at a time, it doesn't leave gaping holes in anyone else's understanding or our own as threads are not guaranteed to be seen by anyone much anyway.

In the context of a thread, and hiding posters, it would obviously be more...obvious.

Sparklingbrook · 22/12/2015 12:50

2016 New Year's Resolution. Not engaging with annoying/ agenda possessing posters on MN. Xmas Grin

DoesntLeftoverTurkeySoupDragOn · 22/12/2015 14:38

The hide thread thing enables me to hide threads which have titles I find offensive. It's also useful to temporarily hide threads about TV programmes I'm having to watch on catch up so that I can avoid accidental spoilers.

EveryoneAnon · 22/12/2015 14:40

Surely if there is a "hide poster" function, the trolls of this world will simply name-change?

Then you are exposed to them all over again. They could actually think it adds to their fun? And so the game goes on!

UnGoogleable · 22/12/2015 14:48

But if you hid a poster, but continued to follow or engage on a thread, wouldn't it make it a bit weird and disjointed? You'd only be 'hearing' part of the discussion.

I just skim past the posters I don't like. Easy.

DixieNormas · 22/12/2015 14:49

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

OddSocksHighHeels · 22/12/2015 21:28

I wouldn't use it if it existed because it would make threads read strangely. The really twattish posts seem to get quoted by others too so you'd probably still read a lot of what you meant to ignore anyway! Plus, how would it work on a site like this where people can name change so easily?

But if others want the function then I'm not against the option being there.

Egosumquisum · 23/12/2015 08:47

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

TiggyD · 23/12/2015 09:36

I agree with lemonPeasFake and TheOnlyMoose . Point 12 in BeardyTruckerWoman's list made a lot of sense as well.

LineyReborn · 23/12/2015 09:39

The colour coding idea - I suppose I'd be thinking of being allowed maybe two extra colours.

So as it is now:

Colour 1 - my own posts
Colour 2 - the OP

And then additionally:

Colour 3 - maybe use that for a 'shit list' (or indeed any other reason, such as watching a poster's or posters' expertise in a particular area of interest - it doesn't all have to be negative)
Colour 4 - maybe use that for 'posters I like' or 'posters to watch for some reason or other'

That's how I would envisage it happening. I think.

bumbleymummy · 30/12/2015 21:36

Just adding my vote against a 'hide poster' button. Please don't.

I think ShowOfHands sums it up very well. There are some posters who I don't tend to agree with (and who don't agree with me) but if we think of MN as a reflection of RL then I think it's very rude to 'blank' someone completely even if you don't agree with them. You may find that you agree with them on different threads and realise that your initial impression of them was wrong. It may actually make you more understanding of their opinions if you get to know them a bit better by chatting about other subjects. That's a bit garbled but I hope it makes sense... Blush

New posts on this thread. Refresh page