Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Site stuff

Join our Innovation Panel to try new features early and help make Mumsnet better.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Since when did this appear at the bottom of each thread?

1039 replies

hulababy · 06/08/2006 22:10

"Add a Message

It is with great regret that we have to ask members to refrain from any further discussion of Gina Ford, her methods or her books on the site. To find out why click here. We'd be very grateful if members could report any mentions of Gina Ford using the "contact Mumsnet" facility (the little red exclamation mark to the right of each posting). Many thanks. MNHQ. "

Never seen it before.

OP posts:
AvaLou · 07/08/2006 16:05

Like I posted on Bounty - I assume they cannot ban any mention of her name, but it is the defamatory and personal comments that they have issue with, and given their treatemnt so far the owners of mumsnet have placed a blanket ban on any mention just to be on the safe side. If it is anything like Bounty on here, then even a postive thread will end up with many posts that are abusive/ negative.

Pat · 07/08/2006 16:05

So cross about all of this
Another recommendation for a journalist to contact is Cassandra Jardine at The Telegraph who writes articles on family matters.

dilEmma · 07/08/2006 16:08

Surely Ann Clough from CLB IS Ms Fd? obvious innit? She seems allowed to email without running it past anyone. Or no-one

Astrophe · 07/08/2006 16:09

her book still has an overall rating of 4 stars on amazon...now... what can we do about that ladies?

You all must promise to post as soon as you see ANYTHING in the paper/hear the radio tomorrow...I can't wait!

AvaLou · 07/08/2006 16:11

Hmm very true, my OH writes letters and emails on behalf of his MD, but they have to be passed to audio typists, then to the M.D's P.A, then to his 'approval team' before being sent out, which takes ages even for very urgent letters.

Mercy · 07/08/2006 16:13

OK, so far

Junior magazine
Pregnancy & Baby magazine
Daily Mail
Times
The Guardian
The Mirror
The Sun
ITN
BBC
5 Live
LBC!
The Answer Bank
Private Eye
David Cameron MP
India Knight
Decca Aitkenhead
BMC
Bounty
Babyworld
The Independent
Western Daily Press
Daily Express
Baby Centre
Pampers
Mothercare
Mumsonline
Netmums
Ivillage
Realworldparenting
BBC London
BBC Essex
Daily Record
The Scotsman
Metro Radio
Boots parenting forum
Labour Party
NY Times
USA Today
Today (US prog.)
RaisingKids
Daily Mail Scotland

Any more?

MrsRichardHammond · 07/08/2006 16:13

ive emailed the lady in question

AvaLou · 07/08/2006 16:16

Evening Standard
The Week

All those weekly womens mags who will print just bout anything, i.e take a break, womans own(worth a try!)

Mercy · 07/08/2006 16:17

Oh yes of course - we need to add nobody to the list!

ChappaEye · 07/08/2006 16:17

Heat mag.

AvaLou · 07/08/2006 16:18

Oh, but of those I have emailed take a break & womans own, can't remember the names of anymore.
I have also emailed 'real ' magazine, who do write articles on parenting issues occasionally.

SlightlyFamiliarPeachyClair · 07/08/2006 16:23

Junior magazine
Pregnancy & Baby magazine
Daily Mail
Times
The Guardian
The Mirror
The Sun
ITN
BBC
5 Live
LBC!
The Answer Bank
Private Eye
David Cameron MP
India Knight
Decca Aitkenhead
BMC
Bounty
Babyworld
The Independent
Western Daily Press
Daily Express
Baby Centre
Pampers
Mothercare
Mumsonline
Netmums
Ivillage
Realworldparenting
BBC London
BBC Essex
Daily Record
The Scotsman
Metro Radio
Boots parenting forum
Labour Party
NY Times
USA Today
Today (US prog.)
RaisingKids
Daily Mail Scotland
Robert Winston Smith
Ian Liddell Grainger, MP
Ken Livingstone (worth a shot LOL)
Boris Johnson (PMSL.....)
Prima Baby
Mark Thomas
New Statesman
Practical Parenting

jabberwocky · 07/08/2006 16:26

This may not be a workable idea, but couldn't MN host from the US where it has more protection from things such as this?

expatinscotland · 07/08/2006 16:28

Hmm. But it's a British board w/British character, thankfully.

Someone's got to take a stand on this! This is getting mental!

SherlockLGJ · 07/08/2006 16:29

Words fail me, they really do.

Not often it happens but I am truly stunned.

SherlockLGJ · 07/08/2006 16:29

Words fail me, they really do.

Not often it happens but I am truly stunned.

jabberwocky · 07/08/2006 16:29

Yes, but I mean just from the technical standpoint. A friend of mine runs a site for Cracker Barrel and works from anywhere in the world at times.

Mascaraohara · 07/08/2006 16:30

there's another forum/webzine thing 'Mothers@work' or something I got a link to hear from here ages ago but can't remember exactly what it's called.. anyone else know?

Uwila · 07/08/2006 16:33

Mothers@work

oranges · 07/08/2006 16:34

There's a piece in the Evening Standard on it.

SlightlyFamiliarPeachyClair · 07/08/2006 16:34

The Telegraph
Junior magazine
Pregnancy & Baby magazine
Daily Mail
Times
The Guardian
The Mirror
The Sun
ITN
BBC
5 Live
LBC!
The Answer Bank
Private Eye
David Cameron MP
India Knight
Decca Aitkenhead
BMC
Bounty
Babyworld
The Independent
Western Daily Press
Daily Express
Baby Centre
Pampers
Mothercare
Mumsonline
Netmums
Ivillage
Realworldparenting
BBC London
BBC Essex
Daily Record
The Scotsman
Metro Radio
Boots parenting forum
Labour Party
NY Times
USA Today
Today (US prog.)
RaisingKids
Daily Mail Scotland
Robert Winston Smith
Ian Liddell Grainger, MP
Ken Livingstone (worth a shot LOL)
Boris Johnson (PMSL.....)
Prima Baby
Mark Thomas
New Statesman
Practical Parenting

thewomanwhothoughtshewasahat · 07/08/2006 16:39

In case anyone's interested this is what I sent to nobody. I don't imagine the last line will mean anything at all to her, but I had to end on something. Most of all though I wanted her to realise what she's doing.

Dear nobody,

I am a regular user of Mumsnet and have found it to be a wonderful resource. It is a fantastic way of accessing the advice and support of other parents. It covers everything: miscarriages, pregnancy and child-birth; depression, healthy diets and drug-smoking teenagers; what to wear to an interview, how to sort out your family tax credits and the best way to deal with mothers-in-law. In short if you need advice on family matters or just want to share a problem, Mumsnet can provide. It is not only a source of advice and support it is a great source of amusement - threads on the wonderfully funny things children say, the silly excuses they give not to go to bed and the most embarassing moments of a hundred odd people are examples of the things on mumsnet that make me laugh. It is thirdly a fantastic forum for debate in which people from a wide variety of backgrounds participate -everything from war in the Middle East and racism in the UK to child-care provision.

It has all the ingredients of a network of friends - people from Mumsnet send each other gifts, hand on things the kids have outgrown, even put each other up for a night.

I was deeply saddened - and shocked - by the letter from your lawyers to Mumsnet, seeking its closure. I cannot reconcile the idea of someone as passionate as you about helping babies, children and families to be contented with the idea of someone who wishes to take away from parents a resource like Mumsnet. Some of the comments that have led you to take this course of action were deeply unpleasant, others were just plain silly. None of them will do anything like as much damage to your reputation as your seeking to shut down Mumsnet.

Your approach to parenting is unique and, in some respects, controversial. It has and always will attract fierce debate. I cannot believe that given the choice between seeing that debate take place in a context that includes certain comments that most rational people will simply disregard and stiffling that debate whilst simultaneously stiffling a whole range of other debates and a resource like Mumsnet you have chosen the action you have. I find it especially suprising given that Mumsnet is a small operation with small resources. I am personally saddened too that this whole issue has meant that two mothers have had far less time with their newborn babies than they wanted.

I ask you whether you have really understood what Mumsnet is and what you wish to take away. I ask you to please reconsider.

Yours

Uwila · 07/08/2006 16:39

ooo What does the Evening Standard say???

newkid · 07/08/2006 16:40

Sending loads of supportive vibes to MNHQ....

This is outrageous. It can only do one person any harm. I used to be a fan of someone's advice but let's just say that recent events have enlightened me!

Mollybird · 07/08/2006 16:44

What page of the Standard? I'm looking at the first edition online and can't see it.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.