Hi again,
Everything about it suggests to me that most children will decide to go to most lessons most of the time. At the end of the day, they're stuck in a wooded campus in a small town without local friends (other than school mates) and little spending money. I'm not sure if they could just play computer games all day instead of going to classes, though, that's the only part that worries me, tbh.
Because they decide to go to lessons, they don't mess the teacher about (so I have heard). Big complaint from DS is about misbehaviour from others.
Because they are a small school, they have to let children work to ability, not being stuck too much with children at lower ability just because they are same age (DS hates listening to long explanations from teacher about something he understood quickly).
Summerhill appeals most because DS is SO un-self motivated, so easily bored, lacking in self-discipline and yet at the same time so very capable intellectually and physically. I am convinced that he never would learn anything if he didn't go to school (except the clever tricks in computer games, of course). He is also the least considerate and patient person in our family.
So I think that living in a community like Summerhill would make him appreciate home and other people more. Intellectually, he'd be suffocated in a conventional secondary (not because he's a genius, but because he needs the room to be creative and he struggles to put up with the cr*p aspects).
Not sure I'm explaining that well. I have 3 other children and I would think they'll be okay at a conventional secondary.
Home-ed would be a nightmare for me.
However, knowing DS he'd manage 2 weeks at Summerhill before declaring it's rubbish and demanding to go home, lol.