We have a choice of 2 schools. School 1 is local, quite small (140 per year group) but has excellent extra curriculars, including a second round of afternoon buses that drop off after the after school sports/clubs finish. Child could leave house at 08:10 and be back 3:15 with no clubs, or 4:30 having done hockey/running/band/whathaveyou. Staff at open days seemed great, but results are average. Historically, this is a school "naice" people have tried to avoid, but demographics mean that they are not getting their first choice and have to lump this school. There is a new head, as well as a good deputy head who's come from another school in the Trust, which is excellent. The vast majority of parents I know who send their kids here are very happy with it. I have questions about the level of ambition at this school and the results.
Our other school would mean leaving the house at 0730am and not getting back until 4:30-5pm. On paper, it's a much better school with excellent progress 8 scores, but it's the kind of school where once people get in they are evangelical about it. There is a significant snob factor (in my mind) associated with this school. There's at least one family on the school bus that I would have serious reservations about my children spending 90 mins a day with. However I feel I am somehow letting my children down by not choosing this academically superior school. For those of you who've done secondary for years, is the stress of a much longer day really worth it?
Neither school have a sixth form FWIW.