As above really, we are in London. DS is very bright, excellent at maths and science. The closest school to us is a really "good" grammar, lots of London parents aim for it. It does get very good results. People say it is not very nurturing, not great parent communication, and seems quite segregated into grammar stream and non grammar stream. We're actually not in catchment despite living a few streets away but I think DS would get a place via selection.
Other school is a bit further away, is now rated good but not very very academic, they don't send many kids to top universities but they are really trying. Great pastoral support, nice community feel, very arty. It's about a 20 minute bus or a 40 minute walk away.
DH and I both went to grammar schools and vowed we would never send our kids there! Our experience was that they were very competitive, very snobby, didn't care about anything but grades. DS isn't the most confident kid, he likes his circle of friends but I worry about bullying and find that almost more important than academics really as he is likely to do well regardless. Am I looking at this wrong? Am I obligated to send him to the best possible school that will push for the best possible results so that he has the best chance in life? I don't really want my kid to have a skewed view of the kind of people who live in his local community, our experience of state grammars was that it was all middle class kids, quite a lot of very rich kids too.
The other thing is that the grammar school is so close by, would be very handy to have a five minute walk to school...