I thought the original system was fair but then I have full confidence that ds school would have done right by all students and been realistic.
But do you think there was possibly any unconscious bias involved? I don't mean that as a dog because being a teacher in 2020 would be my idea of hell! Not just lockdown but now having to go back with no protection.
But I'll explain using my ds what I mean.
Ds has send. He got an ehcp end of year 8. Before this his predicted grades were 4/5's and he could barely tolerate being in a classroom all day.
By end of year 9 this had risen slightly and Bh mocks at beginning of year 11 he was well over his predicted grades.
The school can take full credit for this as they were amazing with him.
But my guess if is you have 10 students say (who like my ds) for a 9 in their mock for a subject and you had to grade them and is usually you get 8 students getting a 9 the 2 you rank lowest are the the ones who you know may get an 8 instead.
I just can imagine a situation where teacher thinks "well Susan has been predicted an 8 since year 8 and mininweird was lredicted a 5, then a 6 and amazed us Bh getting a 9 in the mock. So he's be happier with an 8 than Susan"
(I will add ds also for all 7/8's during year 10 module tests)
As I say that isn't a dig and I actually think that on balance of probability is more likely if only 1 for the 9 it's the way it goes.
I'm asking because ds is now obviously expecting that whatever he gets he can challenge it and get his 9. Yet I'm not actually sure if he gets an 8 that he should iyswim?