Having gone through this a couple of years back, I’d say that even though the Consortium schools may not share their offer lists, it’s probably quite obvious to them all which girls will have scores for G&L and so on. They probably also look at where you live, as well as where siblings might attend. Also, they know which other non-consortium schools you have applied to from the application form so they can have a good idea as to whether they are your “stretch” school or back up.
For instance, my DD a few years back applied to FHSS, PHS, LU, G&L and SPGS. She was offered an academic scholarship from FHS (only a token 5%) and it stated on the offer letter that this was because she was one of the highest performers in the consortium. I think they do this because they could see that she had applied to G&L and knew she had the scores for that and that G&L will invariably take the top x% from that list.
Later I heard about a school, Faulkner House, which gets about half of its girls into SPGS every year and I went on their website to see if this was true (it is)! The leavers’ destinations are shown and you can see that pretty much all the girls who were offered G&L and SPGS tended to have also applied to FHSS and were awarded academic scholarships there. So I think they offer a lot of these 5% scholarship offers as incentives.
Having said this, I think these days, FHSS is definitely starting to give the “top” schools a run for their money!
DD was also offered a small scholarship at PHS and I wonder if this was an inventive because they could see that she’d applied to three schools higher up the league tables?
At the G&L interview, they blatantly asked DD and her friends if they had got through to the SPGS interviews (if they had applied). No other school - just SPGS! I’m not sure if this means they’re more likely to make an offer or less 