This is from my son, who is now sitting in front of the keyboard:
as my mum has already said,i could drop latin to study classical civilisation in year 9. i want to drop it because i find the language far too challenging and i love history and classical civilisation is more history orientated. and i think i can get better marks in classical civilisation if i put in as much effort as i do in latin(which is, yes, quite a lot)!
back to my mum:
me, tigermoth, again....
I did not study latin at school, so feel inexperienced in giving advice. However I am wary of the dumbing down element in this and feel ds1 is capable of studying latin if he put his mind to it. I am aware that not many state schools nowadays make children do latin - ds's grammar school is in a minority. Is this a good or bad thing?
My husband studied latin at school and is adament that ds should not give it up for at least another year so he gets a proper grounding in it.
The school's letter about this states 'If your child gained a satisfactory latin exam result in year 8 we would strongly encourge them to persue latin in year 9 to give them the option of taking latin as well as or instead of classical civilisation at O level'. Also it says latin is 'a valuable basis for other languages, a discipline for clear thinking and a subject of intrinsic interest in its own right'
Ds gained a satisfactory result in his exams with very moderate revision effort. DS has just seem me type this and his head is nodding in agreement. He did not work hard to pass the exam.
So I do feel he is capable of studying latin if he had to, but is it worthwhile making him do it for another year or more?