Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Secondary education

Connect with other parents whose children are starting secondary school on this forum.

Are grammar schools better for above average children?

233 replies

celticclan · 16/07/2013 21:24

I'm talking about your bog standard Grammar in somewhere such as Bucks not Kent (not super-selective schools). Are they better for the top 30% than comprehensive schools? In what way?

I'm personally not keen on the Grammar school system but lots of people are and I'm interested to find out why.

OP posts:
RussiansOnTheSpree · 25/07/2013 15:15

I think you need 3 types of school. Top 10%, Bottom 10%, everyone else. Or even top 5% bottom 5%, everyone else. Then everyone will get a fair crack.

RussiansOnTheSpree · 25/07/2013 15:15

And STOP SHOUTING

RussiansOnTheSpree · 25/07/2013 15:16

IT'S RUDE

beatback · 25/07/2013 15:20

Russians. With reference about whether the type of Grammar School i mentioned exists. I can tell you my newphews Grammar School is one of the types of Grammar Schools i have mentioned and he has just finished his G.C.S.Es at a top 25-30%abilty Grammar School. we are hoping for 2 As 4Bs and 4Cs so the type of Grammar School i was talking about does exist and does the type of job that it should.

GrimmaTheNome · 25/07/2013 15:23

How do you arrive at 5 or 10%? At what age(s) would you make the selection?

beatback · 25/07/2013 15:25

I think putting capital letters in the wrong place and lack of awareness is called Dyspraxia along with struggling with the correct use of Grammar and poor fine motor control as well as terrible handwriting.

GrimmaTheNome · 25/07/2013 15:25

Oh - also - that percentage might work in a city but probably difficult in more rural environments. The old 25% GS model could involve pretty big catchments.

beatback · 25/07/2013 15:30

Top 5%. You mean so the likes of Eton and Harrow/Wycombe Abbey can have more access to the top Universities and top jobs in the Establishment then they already have then.

allmycats · 25/07/2013 15:35

Agree with the post on page 1 by 'skiing gardener' my experience was the same and I do feel that if you can a grammar school education pays dividends in the long term.
I went from infant/junior being mainly left to get on with it just because I could to state grammar where I found that I could be stretched and I
also found that I was not as bright as I thought I was !!

swingofthings · 25/07/2013 16:10

One of my close friend's DD goes to one of those top Kent grammar school. We live in a non grammar school county and so my DD goes to the local comprehensive. They finished primary school with similar levels and 2 years on....my DD actually has higher levels than her girl and yet I don't feel my DD is challenged enough in her school. From what my friend tells me, I really can't see that much difference between her DD's lessons and mine who is in top sets classes for all set subjects.

If we lived in Kent, I would have pushed for my DD to go to grammar school for the reason that this is where the top pupils go, but Kent don't have more academic children than other county and local comprehensive still have to cater for their local academic children, so I really don't think it make that much of a difference.

RussiansOnTheSpree · 25/07/2013 16:45

Grimma By testing. At 11.

Beat Dyspraxia is a medically/ed psych diagnosed condition. It does not mean that you shout at everyone on the internet, nor that you struggle with grammar - it's not an excuse for either of those things, either. And the school that you describe doesn't sound like a grammar school to me, really...

RussiansOnTheSpree · 25/07/2013 16:46

Grimma - sorry, catching up. Superselectives cover humungous areas, they don't have defined catchments.

RussiansOnTheSpree · 25/07/2013 16:47

swing Exactly.

GrimmaTheNome · 25/07/2013 16:52

Most (maybe not all, not sure) 'superselectives' are in fairly densely populated areas. My DDs 'normal' GS has a large catchment (plus some residual places) which makes it as big as you'd want a kid to travel every day. (It gets excellent results BTW.)

RussiansOnTheSpree · 25/07/2013 16:53

Grimma Not the one my DD1 goes to.

RussiansOnTheSpree · 25/07/2013 16:55

Also, I believe people travel very long distances for Tiffins (one of which has now established a catchment, right? Local places for local people?) and for CRGS. And for Pates.

But yes, it probably wouldn't work everywhere. Which is a shame but there you go. It would never happen anyway so no harm in speculating what would be the optimum model.

GrimmaTheNome · 25/07/2013 17:01

But presumably there is some practical limit in reality of how far the parents are willing to have their kid travel (or the school will allow)?

beatback · 25/07/2013 17:05

Well Russians he took the 11+ and passed it and its a state school so i guess its called a "Secondary Modern". Granted it only gets 9% AAB at A level so is not in the Top 50 Grammars in the Country and 95% A* To C Maths and English but is located in a fully selective L.E.A it is 100% a Grammar School maybe not a Super Selective top 3 to 5% of abilty.

GrimmaTheNome · 25/07/2013 17:05

Some GSs seem to manage very well with the 25% approach, so I wouldn't get too worried. (The Colyton place everyone seems to mention on GS threads says 'we offer a selective education to students in the top 25% of the ability range' - maybe that doesn't accurately reflect their actual intake but evidently not beneath consideration.)

RussiansOnTheSpree · 25/07/2013 17:08

Grimma I don't think schools ask, do they? My DD1 has about a 60 mile round trip every day. She loves her bus time. It enables her to work on her relationship with her ipod. I adore the amount of travel I do for the same reason. Grin

beatback · 25/07/2013 17:15

Russians. Do you want me to mame the school so you can check the Dept of Educations definition of the school that my newphew attends. Also Russian why where you so demeaning to me when i was offering you a compliment on your achievement in getting to Oxford and if your Dyspraxia has never been a problem to you than you are "Super Human" and believe me i might not have the Academic Qualifactions or Academic IQ as you but believe me in many other ways i would be the equal of you.

beatback · 25/07/2013 17:19

Do you want me to name the school.

RussiansOnTheSpree · 25/07/2013 17:19

Beat I didn't go to Oxford, I went to Cambridge. I am sure you are a better person than me in every respect. In the light of that I'd prefer it if you didn't shout at me or indeed berate me in any way before. You appear to have selected me as your new 'victim' since the last one name changed. I won't stand for it as long as she did. Or indeed, for any time at all.

Talkinpeace · 25/07/2013 17:22

just got back in from work
Russians
a very arty friend of DDs is doing English Lang, English Lit, Double Science, single Maths, History, Art, RE, French, Spanish

Grimma
the school is 300 per year intake - absolutely standard for Hampshire and many other counties

I find the thought of the carbon footprint of kids doing 30 miles each way to school horrific

Beatback
chillax. Kent is an anomaly. The rest of the country tries not to think about them (other than on Mumsnet)

beatback · 25/07/2013 17:30

I am not a better or worse person than anybody just equal i have not selected anybody as a victim. I do not pick on anybody and i am not a TROLL . I am always on this site because i like talking to people who have far greater Academic qualifactions and knowledge, partly because i never had the chance/confidence or abilty to access higher education. Although i have had a very comfortable life. but please excuse my confrontational way of putting things across, that was the way i got noticed having been a victim at school. I am very sorry i have giving you the wrong impression of me.

Swipe left for the next trending thread