My original question was kind of hypothetical and I'm not really brave enough to actually withold any fees.
Am I the only one here thinking that this whole thread has been a bit of a waste of our time then?
I'm sure the grades predicted were based on the school's assumption that you DTSs would work their socks off doing their own independent revision. Is it not the case that it only came to light that this was not actually happening once they had sat their mock exams, and thus only then did it come to light that they weren't at all on track to reach their potential?
Prior to this the school almost certainly predicted grades that your sons are more than capable of achieving providing they keep their half of the bargain and do enough bloody revision?
I sort of mentioned this (worded differently) pages ago.
Anyway, people answer these threads in good faith, assuming that the OP is beng honest and upfront in the original post.
I suspect that you did have every intention of whithholding fees as it is only now, after 5 pages of replies that you've piped up with this comment.
If so, just be honest and say that you would be wrong to withhold fees, and this thread has made you realise it.
If you had no intention of withholding fees, why post a hypothetical/misleading/dishonest question as your original post?
Grrrrrr
