Or we could not have all of these things? It’s an option you know. I don’t want these things, I want to pay less tax instead. When get a prescription I want to pay for it. I pay and get something back. I know that those who can’t afford it will pay nothing, and the amount paid by those with regular prescription is capped. Just like England
So you end up having to administer a system in which some prescriptions are charged and some are not, meaning extra cost, which means more tax spent managing this, precisely the reason charges were done away with entirely in the first place, i.e. it's cheaper for the government and therefore the taxpayer.
when I pay this endless tax is just all seems to disappear into a black hole, to be used as a piggy bank by the corrupt government we have
Which "piggy bank" is this then?
Unlike the absolute shambles at Westminster, the Scottish Government can't borrow in order to overspend, can't run up Trillions in debt and effectively devalue the entire nation, and what little money they do carry over from one budgetary year to the next is normally no more than a few million.
If you know of "corruption" in the SG, I suggest you report it to the police.
Our NHS costs SO much more per person
Yes, as has already been pointed out to you, this is in keeping with the umpteen demographic reasons why public service costs more to deliver per head in sparsely populated nations than it does in more densely populated ones.
and yet the service is worse than in England
Not by any of the established and recognised metrics it isn't. It comprehensively outperforms it's counterparts in other parts of the UK.