My ex & I are not married & still living under same roof 18m after splitting up, which is hellish.
He wants to buy me out, I want to sell & since the default position is to sell, I am thinking seriously of taking him to court to force the sale.
He should be buying me out at 50% of the title deeds.
However he put in more deposit than me, so I would be happy to return our initial deposits (which I am under no obligation to do) & divide the remaining equity.
We are in Edinburgh so the market is strong & houses go for at least 10-20% over home report value. So I'd get my deposit back, plus the "market effect".
He wants to buy me out, but minusing the deposits only, so that's a far worse scenario for me.
So what I am asking is: for those buying eachother out, is it unreasonable to ask for some "market effect"?
Or have people just bought out at 50%?
Or do others just stick at the surveyor price & ignore market effect?