So I missed the last bit but my takeaway is the tactic of poor recall & quite repetitive & often monotonous rambling answers passes for evidence.
I don't think she's accounted for much that went wrong, denies their decisions were wrong, thinks their assessment at every stage was correct & has no opinion of whether the competence of those she is ultimately responsible for is worthy of disciplinary action/resignation etc.
I can imagine sturgeon loyalists think she did well. I disagree.