I've rtft but very quickly so apologies if I repeat anything. I think the Brexit vote must be a big dilemma for SNP party.
On the one hand, a 'leave' result hands them an argument for another Indy-ref, which they want.
On the other hand, it leaves them negotiating as a completely new entrant into the EU. My feeling during Indy-ref was that this would possibly have been the case anyway in the event of a No vote. Even the most-die hard Indy supporter I know acknowledges leaving NOW means Scotland's position within the EU becomes very much harder.
So this would mean that to persuade people to vote for Indy, the SNP would have to argue against some hard issues
1/ adopting EU
2/ requirement to massively reduce deficit to meet conditions (in other words spending cuts and/or big tax increases - neither of which the SNP faithful are fond of).
3/ adopting shengan - which is fine, but if UK is out it will mean border controls between us and our biggest trading partner.
These will be easily argued, and difficult to argue against. That's off the top of my head.
In addition, they cannot make same economic arguments because GERS figures are not good at the moment. And they can't blether about an oil fund anymore.
No is still ahead of Yes in opinion, and I think it would likely widen.
On balance, I suspect SNP think their best chance of indy will be if UK remain. That would be a long game though. But if we remain it weakens their other argument which is that non-scots are less tolerant of immigration, less 'moral'.
I voted no to Indy and will vote to remain in EU. All for all the same reasons. I think that's the consistent position.
I also think a remain vote will help unify the UK, weaken UKIP, and plays against the SNP's divisiveness.
We really need more evidence of commonality and shared values (which I do believe we all share) to counter that nationalistic horribleness.