There's a lot of useful.insight o.to abusers in the lundy bancrifg book, he identifies their entitlement and their value system.
Stacey Dooley did a documentary on domestic violence against women and interviewes a recurrent offender, in Russia I think, abd he described his desire for control/domination, and his utter self righteousness/feeling of righteousness when he was abusing his partners.
I suppose that righteousness goes back to the values system Bancroft identifies.
To how they see women, as posters above have said.
All those things make ot pretty much impossible for an abuser to feel.theyre wrong or to feel sorry.
As posters have said, they truly believe, or convince themselves that it is the fault of the women.
Also, as mentioned above, they only really seem concerned of they think others might find out about it.
I was in a relationship with an abuser, I have no doubt that to this day he mostly blames me for his behaviour, and/or minimises it.
This is demonstrated by his attitude towards his exes too.
His minimisation was well in force during the relationship; he was just "fiery" but there was no real harm in him etc.
When we finished, I was crying- upset, sad, emotionsl avnd wondering if I was doing the right thing..... he started saying (and repeated it several times) "don't bad mouth me and I won't bad mouth you; ok".
His focus was on being exposed/his reputation etc.
Notably, I found out later that he's been bad mouthing me even before we finished and after we finished I had very weird attitudes from two mutual acquaintances whom i can only presume he spoke to. The character assassination and rewriting is a common thing with them; also goes to show they never acknowledge they're wrong or really feel sorry.