@Sonarl
Nobody should agree to an Agreed Surveyor imo. If a Party Wall is needed because a neighbour wants to do some work on their property whcih will benefit them and increase the value of their property, with absolutely no benefit to the neighbours who will experience inconvenience and noise that is nothing to do with them, then they should have an independent surveyor that the other side should pay for. That's the point of the Party Wall agreement, to protect their interests in an independent manner.
Our neighbors tried to get us to agree to an Agreed Surveyor who turned out to be the woman's Dad!
This is exactly the sort of vindictive, petty attitude which has made party wall issues so ridiculous, and created an entire industry to stoke up neighbourly disputes
95% of party wall requests could be agreed between neighbours with a surveyor proving the building method won't cause any issues to the joint wall, and agreeing that any issues such as cracking, will be repaired by the side doing the building.
It doesn't matter if the surveyor is the dad, brother or pet cat of the client. It's just to show there has been thought given to the construction process so it won't cause structural problems to the joint wall/foundations/whatever
But there seems to now be a frankly pathetic idea that no one should be allowed to get any benefit without suffering a bit in the process and therefore should have to fork out £2k for needless fees
We had a neighbour apply for planning and had a dozen ambulance chasing letters isn the post from party wall surveyors offering to act for us, and warning our house would fall down if we didn't appoint someone.
It is totally unnecessary
The party wall act was designed to mediate for actual problems, not to be a first port of call whenever a neighbour is doing work. The whole system is now totally abused by bitter and jealous neighbours