I don’t think it’s so much about a big wedding and it think it’s unfair to trivialise it as silly girls want pretty frocks whereas big strong men are sensible and above all that.
I think it’s because men can get what they want ( sex on tap, a free housekeeper and someone to raise their children ) without marriage, as many women are happy to provide these on the vague hope that marriage might happen some time in the future. If he feels like it/ if he can get over his parents divorce / his cheating ex / his commitment issues/ once he gets a promotion .
Whereas women can only get the legal protections for them and their children with marriage.
If women didn’t have sex, children or provide domestic servicing without marriage then things would completely reverse and men would be desperate to get married.
I’m not saying that women should do this BTW. But if marriage is important to them it’s not a good strategy to have kids first / take maternity leave / go part time as it completely weakens their negotiating position.
As a PP said, MN seems full of women who have given up their careers, earning potential and pensions and made themselves extremely economically vulnerable for men who won’t even give up a night in the pub and have no intention of every marrying them. It’s sad to see these women begging for “ a ring “ when it’s clear their feckless and selfish partners don't give a fuck about them and their kids security.
And before someone points this out - no I am not talking about all men ever in the history of the planet. I am generalising about some trends I see here on MN and no of course it doesn’t apply to everyone. Women who are high earners or whose partner is the SAHP are much better off (financially) not being married.
Funnily enough, all the men I know who are SAHP are all married. And they all get a day off every weekend as well, while their wives look after the kids.