Honestly? These sort of threads come up SO often and most of the time the truth is...
He’s not that into you.
The man is happy to plod on in comfort but has no real intention of marrying the woman.
If she were to get pregnant he might stick around for a while but he won’t be any more committed to her or to the child, it’s ridiculously easy for men to walk away from their offspring in the Uk with little to no consequences.
Ime (I’m 47) if a man hasn’t proposed within 3 years, he doesn’t truly consider that woman his permanent companion, as far as he’s concerned that woman is just “ok for now”
So often he’ll string her along until she presses the matter or he meets someone else, they split and within a year, 2 at most he’s engaged if not married and a father.
I know this is tough to read/hear but if becoming a mother is important to you, at 35 you don’t have time to waste.
Yes women in their late 30’s and 40’s have babies, but it’s rarely easy at this point for a number of reasons.
Not only declining fertility but increased risk of mc, pregnancy complications, the baby having certain conditions...
It’s up to you to decide if you want to continue to be strung along and risk not becoming a mother.
Words are cheap! Actions are what matter.
Saying “yea I want kids and marriage at some point in the future...” is abstract and non committal
I think what’s holding you back is you fear he’ll make it clear the ending of the above sentence is
“...but not with you”
But if you don’t ask he could make you waste your fertile years hoping he’ll change his mind.
There’s a phrase/meme doing the rounds on sm at the moment, which seems trite but it’s true
don’t let your boyfriend keep you from your husband
There’s a supposed story attached of a woman who spent 10 years with a boyfriend who wouldn’t commit, eventually caught on and ended the relationship and met her husband and married within the year.
Wasting time on a man who only intends on being your boyfriend is pointless and could ultimately be heartbreaking.