I'm struggling to make sense of why it's often argued that an abusive (in this case) alcoholic man is a good dad and a good guy when he emotionally abuses his wife. The kids are privy to this emotional abuse, know about the drinking problem and live in a very unhappy household. I don't understand how the woman can argue that a man like this is a good dad and nice guy and use it as a reason not to leave. Surely they can see the negative effects on the kids? Why do some people think staying together for the kids when the home is toxic is better than divorce?
I've know a few women with abusive husbands or ex husbands and they all say how he's great with the kids and not a bad man. Is it denial? Do they just not realise? Or refuse to acknowledge it? Why are standards so low in so many relationships?
Is it possible to be an abusive husband but a great dad and a nice guy? I don't think so but my views is coloured by my own experience of an abusive marriage.