That’s the thing 4173 - I’m open to sexual experimentation, but within a private relationship with someone I feel is part of my tribe who is “normal” not just someone who has “ticked the same box as me”?
Eg, I got contacted on a mainstream OD site by someone who had more “alternative” tastes, he seemed to present himself in quite a “I’m just a normal guy in a mainstream job who doesn’t want to be outed” way.
So I wasn’t “anti” immediately and we exchanged a few more emails.
But soon he just ended up wanting to “exchange sexual fantasies and get me to agree to a sexual encounter before meeting” so I had to block him 
Of course I think that there is nothing to be ashamed about, consenting adults and all that, but am VERY wary of openly “identifying” as anything.
sexuality/relationships isn’t all there to someone, and my social experience is that connections primarily and solely based on this tend to be pretty emotionally dysfunctional?
At times in my life I simply haven’t had time to date (or meet) someone, so tried OD with a view to more “casual” interactions.
The men who approached me “based on sex first” tended to be very inexperienced/intense/clingy/ crap in bed themselves, with no social skills?
It was like they’d been weeded out of the “normal” dating pool so had gone weird and sexually desperate ?
Even though I didn’t want a traditional relationship, as a strategy I was better off dating presenting myself as fairly “traditional” (and getting lovers along the way)
outside of the crazy teenage world of twitter and the Internet, often asking people to identify as X is “setting people up” to be some oddball or “spokesperson” when they don’t want to be?
It’s like asking all gay people identify themselves as someone with no other interests but LGBT issues, or saying all BME people have to be wildly interested in immigration politics.
Or if a woman is (privately) into the BDSM/poly scene she’ll “do it with anyone and can’t deny consent and loves spending time discussing sex with complete strangers because she enjoys it so much”
I don’t see myself as some rebellious “poly counter cultural spokesperson” who is “against da world” just because I discretely want a private relationship set up that works for me?
There’s often a vicious layer of underlying misogyny?
Often “spare, visibly “single”, attractive female” is a strange social place to be ?
A lot of married men assume “up for it” and women assume “chasing their men”
. Adding “not monogamous” to the equation is probably adding to the unpleasant mix.
Ultimately I suppose it’s about finding the right “core people” to engage/socialise with?
maybe meeting/dating normally/ forming that bond THEN sort of moving towards the “relationship structure” chat is the way forward?
What actually goes on at poly conferences, by the way?
And is there an OD site that has worked for anyone? 