Sorry for long post but don't want to drip feed.
B and SIL had their first baby (boy) at the beginning of March. Right from 6 months into her pregnancy SIL said they didn't want any visitors at all (including both sets of grandparents) for 2 weeks after the birth. Fair enough, I thought privately that was a little bizarre but I come from an enormous family so I figured it was just my upbringing speaking. And obviously they wanted to get settled in, etc etc. Fine, no problem. Fast forward to now and they still have not allowed any visitors. DP got annoyed with this as he likes to plan our weekends and they still hadn't let us know what weekend they wanted us to come. So he calls his brother and his brother suggested a weekend mid-May. We'd wanted to come at the same time as MIL (FIL passed away a few years ago) so we could all see him together and see her at the same time, but SIL and BIL say they want people to have 'one on one time' with baby. MIL is upset with this as she wanted to see us all together. DP is furious with his brother.
I am sort of piggy in the middle here as it's totally their prerogative to allow visitors as and when they want but at the same time it is a bit like...well...you can't expect people to suddenly drop plans when convenient for you. I know when everyone turns up after the birth it's overwhelming for some women and it gets a bit pass the parcel with the baby, so of course they don't want everyone turning up at once. But I don't think MIL, me and DP are much of a crowd (all v quiet, non demanding people). DP wants to say something to his brother. I'm not sure if he should or not. What do others think?
To add: we all live near enough so that we could easily just drop in for 45 mins/an hour - this would not be an overnight house guest situation. I doubt we would even need feeding.
To clarify: I am not trying to have a debate about whether or not they should have allowed visitors sooner, my question is whether it is reasonable for us to ask to go at the same time as MIL.