The reason I find your view so offensive chipping is that it is views like yours which allow men to be feckless fathers, with disastrous consequences on their children. These children have no say in the method of their conception, so how is it fair to victimize them because of it?
From your point of view, all a man has to say is 'I didn't want it' and he has to have nothing further to do with his child. Do you not understand the consequences of this? Children would be deprived of financial support which is their right, and any 'wanted' child could quite easily be disowned too if the father decides he no longer 'wants' them. After all, all he would have to say according to you is that his partner told him she was on contraception.
Conception is a risk of sex. Fact. Everyone (men and women) knows this, and it is up to everyone to decide to either abstain or take the risk of having a child if having sex.
Both men and women should deal with the consequences of this. Quintessential women do have to take responsibility too: it involves either giving birth to a child or having an abortion. The fact that women have the right to choose abortion in this country should in no way confound this.
Men have the choice over whether they are involved with their children, but on a financial basis they can be at least made to take responsibility.
Comments like these smack of daily mail trollop, and only further propagate the idea that it is ok for men to walk away from their children without a backward glance.
OP I hope that you have support from family/friends. From your posts it sounds like you do definitely do not want an abortion.