People were being hysterical. You can't always judge people. People basically saying he was a paedo on page one and whipping up hysteria, were exactly that, hysterical. They can't possibly say. Men can be affectionate you know, playful. It's allowed.
Also the tarnishing of men. They are stupid, naive, dumb if they show affection towards kids. It's all DM whipped up hysteria. That has all been trotted out, right here.
Do people not see the sadness in that? Men can't be playful with kids, withiout being "dumb" as to what, that may mean.
I was in a hurry I was on my iphone, which cuts bits out if you swipe and is a pig to proof read. So stop putting words in my mouth 
I can do those too.
It's also not irrelevant. You know women can be paedos to right? So why do men specifically have to watch what they do with children? Why not women. That was my whole point, people get hysterical over a bloke showing affection, saying he should "know better". What about women?
As I said the press have done a good job of turning men into paedos. It's sad. Really sad.
I think people read too much crap tbh.