Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Radio/podcast addicts

Discuss your favourite podcast, radio show or The Archers episode.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

ONE HUNDRED NOT OUT – come here to mark The Archers’ threads, a MN phenomenon

186 replies

DadDadDad · 16/02/2019 23:40

First, a little bit of history. On 24 April 2013, user @PseudoBadger started a thread to discuss The Archers: www.mumsnet.com/Talk/radio_addicts/1740045-Why-is-Lillian-allowing-this-to-happen?pg=1

It gained a life of its own and by August that year it was nearly full, so she started a second one. I notice that one of the early posts there, said “Pseudo - was that your most successful thread ever?” Oh, if only she had known what lay ahead. Grin The chain of threads continued, typically taking around a month to fill, although at times of the highest drama threads would move fast, which explains why around 6 years later, we are close to starting thread 100.

Most of those threads were started by Pseudo, although she has since passed the reigns on, and the self-organising collective of regular posters has managed not to drop the baton.

I said above that the rate at which threads filled up fluctuated as posters responded to dramatic events in Ambridge (Kirsty’s scream-wrenching abandonment on her wedding day was an early high point, but I’m sure you all know or can guess what storyline of the past few years sent the rate to stratospheric levels Shock ). This intrigued me enough to record the start date and number of posts for each thread in a spreadsheet, and so observe how the posting rate moved around.

That means I know that we have made between us over 95,000 posts in our discussion of The Archers. (We tend to move on before reaching the 1,000 limit). In a few months, we will reach 100,000 posts!

The 50,000th post came at an exciting time. It actually happened on 3 April 2016, the night a knife was wielded and blood (and custard) were spilt. We filled a thread in one day! And in the midst of the febrile posting, someone made post 50,000 - delightfully, it was Pseudo herself. Star See here: www.mumsnet.com/Talk/radio_addicts/2606356-50-ways-to-leave-your-lover-Get-on-the-bus-Gus-give-a-knife-to-your-wife-Rob-How-not-to-write-helpful-storylines-masterclass-from-The-Archers?pg=9 (post made at 22:08).

Around that time, the idea was floated of asking MNHQ for a new smiley that would reflect The Archers. Someone suitably statistically minded Wink collected the “votes” for various ideas, and MNHQ joined the discussion: www.mumsnet.com/Talk/radio_addicts/2603454-Bunting-the-Bull-An-Eggmobile-Other-Ambridge-crime-scenes-Potential-emoticon

In the end, MNHQ gave us this --> Archers [ archers ] I’ve always taken it to represent the community spirit on this thread, much as The Bull is a focus of the community in Ambridge.

So, what should we do to celebrate thread 100 or 100,000 posts? Ask for another smiley? What would it be and what would it mean?
I know some have floated the idea of representing 'BOOP' which is a word users came up with (named after user BitOutOfPractice) to mean something that we wanted to praise about an Archers episode (as a counter to always being critical).

I wonder if we should just ask for a BADGER smiley, to remember our founder? Even just her unerring ability to think up witty thread titles over the years is surely reason enough to honour her. I’m open to what it could represent…

ONE HUNDRED NOT OUT – come here to mark The Archers’ threads, a MN phenomenon
OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
PresidentOliviaMumsnet · 28/02/2019 20:37

Ah those folk at MNHQ were so obliging. Grin
Amazing to see 100 thread since PseudoBadger
How are we all?

BoreOfWhabylon · 28/02/2019 20:45

Olivia! Mwah Mwah! You're not blue anymore. Have you moved on to better things or do you still dabble in MNHQ?

PresidentOliviaMumsnet · 28/02/2019 20:47

Alas I'm not blue because I've lost my MNHQ badge Sad- I have indeed moved on to other things and RL massively got in the way of posting Sad but I've dusted off my old log in to come and talk all things Ambridge in advance of the Sheffield conference as I wanted to pick your collective brains.

BoreOfWhabylon · 28/02/2019 20:52

It's lovely to see you again! Everyone is over on the other thread (99). This is the one planning for the 100th.

Can you put in a word with your contacts for a celebratory centipede?

visitorthedog · 28/02/2019 20:56

A tankard of Tumble Tussock?

DadDadDad · 01/03/2019 20:52

thislido - good one, but I'm marking you down for not introducing that link with "earwig go..." Grin

OP posts:
thislido · 01/03/2019 20:56

I consider myself a spectator in the Archers Threads Pun Stakes!

ErrolTheDragon · 04/03/2019 10:52

Apparently thread 99 is nearly full (I can't see the post count on the app) and needs a title... maybe discuss here rather than squandering the last few there?

Minimammoth · 04/03/2019 14:19

With my devious mind I wondering if the whole wedding is a plot between Kirsty and Natasha for revenge. She will jolt him and Kirsty will fly away on her broomstick cackling( I hope). Kirsty and Natasha then hook up for the first lesbian partnership on the Archers.

TheSilveryPussycat · 04/03/2019 14:28

Minima I love this idea. Technically it should go on the other Archers thread, which is the one for discussing the programme. So I suggest you post it there if you haven't already done so, where I am certain it will be received with glee!

Minimammoth · 04/03/2019 18:35

I’m sorry I didn’t know there was another thread, don’t we discuss the program here? I’ve only ever posted on this one. Speculating is part of the fun. We often gaze into mystic bores crystal ball.

thislido · 04/03/2019 18:59

Main thread here: www.mumsnet.com/Talk/radio_addicts/3507757-Thread-99-yes-99-Join-us-for-spirited-discussions-of-The-Archers-and-its-Top-Blokes-whether-youre-Team-Elizabeth-low-spirits-Team-Kate-Spiritual-Home-or-Team-Toby-spirits-gin?msgid=85348504

This one was just a confusing diversion by DDD because he fears his statistics being sullied.

Spoilers thread here, if you really like speculation (never it be repeated on the main thread!): www.mumsnet.com/Talk/radio_addicts/3439443-keep-it-to-yourself-the-archers-spoilers-thread-4

DadDadDad · 04/03/2019 19:35

The point of this thread was to run alongside the threads discussing The Archers, and try to reach a conclusion about any way we could celebrate this great milestone.

Unfortunately, I'm not sure a conclusion is emerging... Confused

OP posts:
thislido · 04/03/2019 20:47

Sorry DDD, I was joking Grin

DadDadDad · 04/03/2019 20:49

I wasn't taking offence, I was just explaining to mini the purpose of this thread, and wondering if it has a purpose... Grin

OP posts:
thislido · 04/03/2019 20:53

Oh good! It does have a purpose. Maybe to conclude things I’ll make a proposal and we can gauge reactions.

I say we ask MN for a triangle of bunting with an insect. Ayes to the right?

TheSilveryPussycat · 04/03/2019 21:07

Ok with this - would prefer insect to be a centipede if poss. Although it would be very small if it was on bunting. Perhaps we need input from The Powers That Be as to what is technically possible?

thislido · 04/03/2019 21:42

Amendment accepted! Centipede on bunting. Let’s see f anyone else has anything say and then MN can figure it if it’s possible.

MereDintofPandiculation · 04/03/2019 22:08

would prefer insect to be a centipede if poss A centipede isn't an insect. It's an arthropod, as are insects, but insects have to have bodies divided into 3 parts and 3 pairs of legs.

Besides, centipedes are nice things to have, they're predators, so they eat things that infest. So if you bring centipedes into the mix, you won't get over-infested.

Actually, I don't really mind what's on the smiley, I just like my taxonomy to be accurate.

MereDintofPandiculation · 04/03/2019 22:11

Quite like a triangle of bunting. What about bunting with a clothes moth? The larva, which does the damage, isn't very photogenic. Neither is the moth, it holds its wings to its side when not flying, so just looks like a cylinder. But other infesting things like woodworm or flour beetles wouldn't be very interested in the bunting.

MereDintofPandiculation · 04/03/2019 22:12

In deference to the farming focus, square of bunting with a cleg?

thislido · 04/03/2019 22:28

Thank you for the clarification. I think if enough centipedes arrived en masse I’d feel infested!

Had to google cleg, I only know them as horse flies!

So bunting with an insect or arthropod which will no doubt be rendered fairly vaguely in pixels.

What’s this about a square of bunting? Can bunting be square??!

MereDintofPandiculation · 04/03/2019 23:03

What’s this about a square of bunting? Me talking rubbish. I've spent the evening choosing and resizing pictures to paste into a management plan to make it look more impressive to people who might be impressed by that sort of thing ...you can't blame me if my brain has gone to sog.

So - triangle of bunting with an arthropod? You and I have a consensus, albeit not a very useful one.

TheSilveryPussycat · 04/03/2019 23:09

I knew that about centipedes. But didn't want to overcomplicate my post Smile
I agree you can be overinfested with centipedes, and I know they are good for the garden.
As I've said before, I think being overinfested with The Archers is actually a good thing Grin