Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

Property/DIY

Join our Property forum for renovation, DIY, and house selling advice.

New build on a new estate and social housing. I expect I’ll get torn to shreds but can I have your experiences please?

391 replies

ohwhats · 05/06/2026 19:32

We are looking at buying the last house on a street that backs on to an area of the new estate that will be 50 plus houses owned by a housing association.
The house will be a real bargain, they are throwing all sorts of incentives in as I’m sure they want it sold asap as it will be ready in about 6 weeks time.
The sales advisor explained that the tenants will all be working and they won’t be misbehaving as they will lose their tenancy if they do.
DH thinks it will be fine and we should take a chance but I’m really not sure. Had anyone bought next to AH on a new build estate?

OP posts:
Nextlevely · 07/06/2026 20:08

Kirbert2 · 07/06/2026 19:57

Not always. I got a council house just last year after only waiting for a month and I'm not 'very dysfunctional' at all, I have a disabled child and my private rental was unsuitable for him.

Depends where you live. Where I live that would not have happened.

Kirbert2 · 07/06/2026 20:20

Nextlevely · 07/06/2026 20:08

Depends where you live. Where I live that would not have happened.

Most have disability as the top banding. Even more so if an adapted property is needed which was the case for us.

JenniferBooth · 07/06/2026 20:24

YesAndThenAgainNo · 07/06/2026 19:56

Blaming people in here for the feral behaviour of a subset of council tenants is the very epitome of left-wing idiocy.

People like you seem incapable of assigning any sense of agency to the families who choose to predate on the rest of us.

Of course, very few who spout this shit actually live amongst it.

But i DO live in social housing. You need to read what i posted not that far upthread.

John Boughton (author of Municipal Dreams The Rise and Fall of Council Housing) on the welfarisation of council housing.
//www.insidehousing.co.uk/insight/the-rise-and-fall-of-council-housing-56139
Inthe 1980s, residualisation may have been a partly unintended consequence of housing policies pursued with varying ideological intent
Since 2010, and more so since the return of single-party Conservative government in 2015, we’ve seen something further: welfarisation – ‘a conception of social housing as a very small, highly residualised sector catering only for the very poorest, and those with additional social “vulnerabilities”, on a short-term “ambulance” basis

And they did this because its what people/voters wanted.

Nextlevely · 07/06/2026 20:32

Kirbert2 · 07/06/2026 20:20

Most have disability as the top banding. Even more so if an adapted property is needed which was the case for us.

True but as I said in my other comment I was homeless for a year with my kids and didn’t get anywhere with it. And that is also supposed to be top priority. Where I live (and in many parts of the uk now) they only house the most fucked up

WhatNextImScared · 07/06/2026 20:33

Edictfromno10 · 05/06/2026 19:34

There's a reason why it's a bargain with incentives and not sold as yet...

Yeah, and it’s not to do with the social. It’s to do with the wider market and developers don’t have the margins they once had. New builds used to immediately devalue in completion but now they’re going at a much lower price as they need them off books, there no premium anymore

WhatNextImScared · 07/06/2026 20:34

JenniferBooth · 07/06/2026 20:24

But i DO live in social housing. You need to read what i posted not that far upthread.

John Boughton (author of Municipal Dreams The Rise and Fall of Council Housing) on the welfarisation of council housing.
//www.insidehousing.co.uk/insight/the-rise-and-fall-of-council-housing-56139
Inthe 1980s, residualisation may have been a partly unintended consequence of housing policies pursued with varying ideological intent
Since 2010, and more so since the return of single-party Conservative government in 2015, we’ve seen something further: welfarisation – ‘a conception of social housing as a very small, highly residualised sector catering only for the very poorest, and those with additional social “vulnerabilities”, on a short-term “ambulance” basis

And they did this because its what people/voters wanted.

Edited

How fantastic to see that brilliant book quoted here!

Kirbert2 · 07/06/2026 20:51

Nextlevely · 07/06/2026 20:32

True but as I said in my other comment I was homeless for a year with my kids and didn’t get anywhere with it. And that is also supposed to be top priority. Where I live (and in many parts of the uk now) they only house the most fucked up

In my area, homeless is band B but disability is band A. I unfortunately also know people in temporary accommodation who were made homeless on band B who have been waiting for years.

Temporary accommodation wasn't suitable for my son which is a reason why I was band A and got housed quickly.

YesAndThenAgainNo · 07/06/2026 21:07

JenniferBooth · 07/06/2026 20:24

But i DO live in social housing. You need to read what i posted not that far upthread.

John Boughton (author of Municipal Dreams The Rise and Fall of Council Housing) on the welfarisation of council housing.
//www.insidehousing.co.uk/insight/the-rise-and-fall-of-council-housing-56139
Inthe 1980s, residualisation may have been a partly unintended consequence of housing policies pursued with varying ideological intent
Since 2010, and more so since the return of single-party Conservative government in 2015, we’ve seen something further: welfarisation – ‘a conception of social housing as a very small, highly residualised sector catering only for the very poorest, and those with additional social “vulnerabilities”, on a short-term “ambulance” basis

And they did this because its what people/voters wanted.

Edited

And, again, blaming the feral families’ actions on other people is ridiculous. No-one else is to blame for their actions.

JenniferBooth · 07/06/2026 21:08

YesAndThenAgainNo · 07/06/2026 21:07

And, again, blaming the feral families’ actions on other people is ridiculous. No-one else is to blame for their actions.

I wasnt blaming others for their actions Try to think critically

OMGafourth · 07/06/2026 21:26

I bought my first house in the early 2000s, when housing associations had to have a certain ratio of private to tenanted properties per road/estate.
When we viewed the estate agent questioned whether I'd thought it through and wanted to go ahead due to the bad reputation of the area.
I was there for 5 years, with some really lovely neighbours. The type that would help you change your tyre if it was flat/shout you a pint of milk when you couldn't get to the shop etc.
I wouldn't right the house off just because of HA properties being near by.

YesAndThenAgainNo · 07/06/2026 21:31

JenniferBooth · 07/06/2026 21:08

I wasnt blaming others for their actions Try to think critically

You explicitly were. You wrote “When this happens there is no chance to build communities and you get the very ghettos people are complaining about. ”

Your inability to assign agency to the people you live among is bizarre.

JenniferBooth · 07/06/2026 21:34

YesAndThenAgainNo · 07/06/2026 21:31

You explicitly were. You wrote “When this happens there is no chance to build communities and you get the very ghettos people are complaining about. ”

Your inability to assign agency to the people you live among is bizarre.

You need to quote my whole post and be a bit less selective

THIS is the whole post

Its what ppl wanted Do i really need to pull the threads screeching for five year fixed tenancies. They wanted housing estates to be treated like hostels with ppl being moved around like chess pieces.
When this happens there is no chance to build communities and you get the very ghettos people are complaining about. Never has the phrase "be careful what you wish for" been so apt

Thumber · Yesterday 07:34

You definitely don’t have to be “absolutely desperate” or “next level fucked” or whatever else is being said, to get a council house. We were privately renting (although definitely struggling with rent costs), as were some of our lovely neighbours on our current HA street, and we were on the council list just incase we happened to be lucky enough for something to come up. We got extremely lucky and now live in a HA house. My experience on previous HA streets was also that most people were normal, hardworking (albeit minimum wage style jobs) and kind people. But like I said in a previous post, it just takes 1 person who is an absolute nightmare to destroy it for everyone else and on 1 street this did happen. Everybody on the street complained to the HA repeatedly, some people even reported her to the police and unfortunately nothing was done. We moved to a rented property and have no idea what ever happened to the lady who ruined the street for everyone else.

Thumber · Yesterday 07:35

And we live in a VERY sought after area, but there’s hell of a lot of new build estates going up around here and therefore HA houses have to be built in these estates now too, so despite being in a sought after area, there are many many houses being built.

AutisticLass2026 · Yesterday 08:16

Well having been someone given a new house in social housing on a new estate where half was private and I only lasted 6 months...Once every one on social side started moving in it became rowdy, the walls were paper thin, people on private side constantly falling out with several neighbours because of multiple cars and parties,loud music etc..lovely house but didn't work for me

New posts on this thread. Refresh page