Hello, I’m wondering if I’m very out of touch here. If you’ve noticed similar recently I’d be interested to hear it.
I’ve been to see a few dooer uppers recently and they seem to be priced without taking into account that they need massive amounts of cash spending on them.
For instance, a house that’s in need of a full renovation including rewire, not a single room that wouldn’t need everything from replastering and new flooring have been priced very similarly to a house that requires no more than a lick of paint and new carpets at your leisure. I’m talking a 5k reduction.
These Renos aren’t selling understandably but surely if a house needs 60k spending on it and the house next door needs nothing, then you’d take 60k off your asking price, not 5k? The longer these houses aren’t selling the more internal damage, more possibilities of squatters or rodents, even more possibility of another market crash. It just seems ludicrous to try selling a dilapidated property for a the same price as a perfectly liveable one in the same street, with the same amount of bedrooms and space but I’m fully prepared to be told I am missing something here