Has anyone been in a situation where a surveyor recommended staying away from a property, but you bought it anyway? Is it completely reckless to do so?
Here’s a brief overview of my situation:
- We had an offer of £265k accepted for a three-bedroom semi-detached house.
- While waiting for the legal process to complete, the adjoining property went up for auction and sold for half of what we offered.
- It turns out the neighboring house has subsidence issues, likely caused by drain water damage on a slope. The insurance company offered a settlement because the repair costs were higher than the property's value.
- The new owners of that property plan to start remedial work, including underpinning, and claim it won’t cost anywhere near as much as the insurance had estimated.
- Despite the subsidence next door, the house we’re buying shows no signs of structural issues. The previous owners lived there for decades, and it’s only on the market now because they passed away.
- Our surveyor, who also surveyed the neighboring property, advised us to steer clear of this purchase. They’re concerned that the remedial work next door could affect our house and reduce its value.
We understand the logic behind the surveyor's advice, and it’s hard to ignore. However, we’ve fallen in love with the property and don’t want to give up on it without exploring all options. Could further investigation be worthwhile, or is this a clear sign that we should walk away?