@WestminsterWanderer
usertaken
There is literally one in the same development that is £25k less and has ensuite:
https://www.rightmove.co.uk/properties/148015157#/media?id=media4&channel=RES_BUY
If you can justify why a buyer should buy your place over this then that needs to be in the listing. That place is also unsold so chances are £425k is too high for that as well.
I just think it's the price. There are loads of these blocks all over London which were priced up to £450k for the HTB limit and sellers are trying to sell for what they paid for it despite there being no government schemes and high interest rates making things unviable for investors.
Bang for the buck it's poor value compared to some houses which are £50k more but offer more outdoor space and no high service charges.
Not directly comparable- that one is a much worse flat.
It doesnt have the great hall and the flow that the OPs flat has.
It is also considerably smaller
Its 2nd floor (or maybe 3rd the agent doesnt seem sure) and the OPs is 1st floor
1st floor is generally more desirable.
I disagree. I prefer higher flats and I'd much prefer the shapes of the rooms in that flat rather than those in the OPs flat. The hall in the OPs flat is great but having the space in the main rooms and as an en-suite is more useful. The full width balcony is good too.
I'm not sure as I can't be bothered working it out but I think they are similar sizes. I think The OPs estate agent has included the size of the balcony but it hasn't been included in the first flat.
I still think OPs flat is lovely but I'd definitely look at both flats if I was interested.