I really don't know why everyone keeps saying that this place is "rural".
Have a look on the map.
It is 1.4 miles from the railway station, less than a mile from the nearest primary school and the nearest large supermarket is 3 miles away.
This is an area full of very large homes (many with swimming pools in their large grounds). This is what some of the neighbouring properties to that house look like.
This one is literally 600 metres from the OPs "remote" house
https://www.rightmove.co.uk/properties/146869187#/?channel=RES_BUY
and then these are just around the corner from there:
https://www.rightmove.co.uk/properties/146586407#/?channel=RES_BUY
https://www.rightmove.co.uk/properties/137446436#/?channel=RES_BUY
"To get the train station I'll need to drive, to get to the shops I'll need to drive! Does anyone do this ?"
Are you coming from London by any chance? Outside of London then, yes, it is very common for people to drive to do these things. Especially if you live in a large house like the ones above.
We used to live in a medium sized city of around 250,000 people in quite a nice area in one of the suburbs. Even then, the railway station was 3.5 miles away, the nearest supermarket (and pub, post office etc) just over a mile away, the nearest primary school about 0.5 miles away and the nearest secondary school was 2.4 miles away.
Nobody walks those sorts of distances (except the primary school).
I find this whole "if there isn't a cafe within walking distance" thing very odd indeed. The only cafes that existed where I lived were in the city centre which was 3.5 miles away.
Is this a London thing?